|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
matcom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:06 AM Original message |
Did Scientists CURE CANCER last week and nobody noticed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Holy Crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rubberducky
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. Is this for real?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. my question exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:12 AM Original message |
This was posted last week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV Whino
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
42. I have always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmokingJacket
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #42 |
53. They only want to treat chronic conditions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 06:21 AM Response to Reply #53 |
82. Then why do they develop so many vaccines? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmokingJacket
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #82 |
91. Because vaccines are the motherload: you treat people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:32 AM Response to Reply #42 |
88. A belief I share... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. The corporate sponsored news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mconvente
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
27. It is for real - actual published paper link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #27 |
78. The PDF is $30.00 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mconvente
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #78 |
90. Weird - I can click on the pdf and get it fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. can we get this on the greatest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
7. I'm wondering that too. WHY aren't we hearing about this??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. PHARMA probably used more money to kill the story as there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
9. Saw that too. Been waiting for the big whoop-la. Nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
10. "pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to pay because they can’t make money on unpatented medicines" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllegroRondo
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. More likely that they dont want to lose profits on their cancer treatments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Yep - but as long as the cat's out of the bag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. SOMEBODY, will find a way to make money from it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
63. They have plenty of pull in the WTO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #63 |
76. Open-source medicine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:51 AM Response to Reply #63 |
80. One of the things for which I can not excuse Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #10 |
24. If it's approved for a new use, they CAN get a patent for that use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Epiphany4z
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:20 AM Response to Reply #24 |
81. I thought so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
57. The drug approval process is paid for by drug mfgrs. They fund the so called 'independent studies' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
62. Aprin used to be patented. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poverlay
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
11. It's likely that anything can be cured, but there's no money to be made in cures... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Agreed. I've always said if you pay someone to look for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
43. The old traditional Chinese physicians used to be paid to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poverlay
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
51. That's a great idea. We should start a "reward fund". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweet Freedom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. scientists in Canada find a cure for diabetes too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
15. That's always the bottom line isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coznfx
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. There's nothing inherently wrong with money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Staph
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
17. Can we get a couple of gallons of this stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
18. It's possible, but many drugs that show hope in initial tests turn out not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. i realize that BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. there's no media coverage because there's no story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Yep. There's nothing sinister going on this time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #26 |
64. That's what I thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #20 |
87. This wouldn't be the first "cure for cancer" that didn't pan out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. even if DCA doesn't work in humans these results suggest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. people have been working on that for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eallen
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
54. How would such a patent prevent off-label purchase? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
83. Please keep in mind what "New Scientist" is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
19. Perhaps. It must be tested on humans to know for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
23. I think the big problem is funding the research, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oblivious
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
52. Avon alone has raised $450 million in its Breast Cancer Crusade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
25. I wonder how long before some Big Pharma sponsored group conducts "studies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #25 |
84. And single orphan hermits will be conducting that research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
28. Does Molly know about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
59. Unfortunately, once cancer has taken it's toll, it's already damaged the body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Maybe you should check out the real truth on the fusion story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Heh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I thought so too (the debunking that is) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Yeah, see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueDachi
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Not debunked but torpedoed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
56. Thanks - and gosh I admire your ability to be concise! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueDachi
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #56 |
92. Thanks! I try ... :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
50. no, see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
55. Chemically speaking - if a bottle of RoundUp that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
47. If cold fusion was a true wonder then Iran and Korea and Bangladesh would have it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
44. My dad worked with one of the scientists who checked their math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Video on Google (THe link to Cold Fusion Vid) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
35. I noticed! --Can't get anybody to cover it though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
36. Keep in mind please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
37. FDA will never approve it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
38. IF they did they need to get it to Molly Ivins - STAT! (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
45. I hope big pharmaceuticals doesn't shut this down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:23 AM Response to Reply #45 |
85. Car company execs wouldn't lose loved ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #85 |
89. Your perspective is one perspective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
48. No clinical trials yet that I can find. That means about 10 yrs before it can be given to patients. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
61. according to the article it's been in use for years. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. For metabolic disorders, not cancer. Has to undergo clinical trials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Ah I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Off label prescriptions for cancer treatment would not be reimbursed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
49. This dovetails with the role of inflammation and high calorie diets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Do you have a link, Bernardo? Having psoriatic arthritis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #58 |
73. Read up on the Zone Diet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #58 |
75. There are many links. Use Google and engage a skeptical mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. I've read that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #60 |
74. Partly. Part of the reason why low dose aspirin (an anti-inflammatory) is effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
86. Inflammation is going to be the key to a lot of disease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
65. Maybe pharmaceuticals won't pay, but what about hospitals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
66. dam near |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
70. no. the pharmas don't stand to make any money off it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
71. Why d'ya think the NCI just had it's budget slashed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HappyWeasel
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. At least we know what to do in the Black Market if the great pharmacuetical satan smotes this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QMPMom
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
77. I may be a diehard American from Indiana, but I am so proud to live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
79. KICK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alameda
![]() |
Fri Feb-02-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #79 |
93. donate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC