Which is more dangerous, Faux News or the Republican Party ?

[steve2470]

Poll question: Which is more dangerous, Faux News or the Republican Party ?

Feel free to add your own most dangerous enemy.

[Subdivisions]

1. Fux Snus. n/t

[whatchamacallit]

2. Is there a difference?

:shrug:

[steve2470]

4. excellent point nt

[ixion]

11. my thought exactly n/t

[rucky]

3. If it weren't for FOX, the GOP would be extinct. n/t

[AlinPA]

7. Yep.

[DFW]

5. That's like asking what's the difference between H2O and water n/t

[tridim]

6. They're the same thing, but I voted Faux anyway..

Because it represents the GOP lie factory with a direct line to their mush-brained audience.

[LongTomH]

8. Would you rather contract Bubonic Plague or Ebola?

Typhoid fever or smallpox? Would you rather have your throat cut or be beheaded?

[MineralMan]

9. Other: How would you tell them apart?

[EC]

10. But since future repub canidates look to be Fox reporters

aren't they one and the same?

[Cleita]

12. Listening to Bernie Sanders trash the MSM on

Thom Hartmann yesterday, I believe Fox News and most of the mainstream media are more dangerous because they can take a propaganda point and run a message over and over again 24/7 until a majority of the population believes it. The latest is that Obama is a muslim and 70% of Americans believe it. I believe the second most dangerous are the large fundie churches that preach the same messages from their pulpits. Marry that to the propaganda news and presto, bingo, you have the situation we have today.