|
Edited on Mon Aug-23-10 03:40 PM by RandomThoughts
You can't say it is illegal if they are allowed to do it.
Black rooms, techs at some company, censorship, all that could happen, and if there is not equal enforcement, then what do the laws mean anyways.
Some want the current system to be anarchy with lack of justice enforced equally.
I am not worried about people spying on me. Nor am I worried about people spoofing email.
I just don't use email because it is not possible to know if something is spoofed.
Although could say the same for posting on a forum :shrug:
Let me make it more simple, personal observation does not match with effects that should occur if internet was not spoofed or censored.
In other words, you can prove different connections by seeing if something can move from one place to another, and primary and secondary effects that should occur do not always occur after posting, so it is obvious that there is censorship or spoofing.
If you tell Jane to give Jill a pencil, then you look at Jill and she does not have a pencil, you can deduce Jane did not do what was said to her.
If you tell Jane something to tell Jill, then Jill does not know it, you can assume there is a censor or Jane decided not to tell Jill it.
It is looking at functions not data.
LOL so you obliterate Jane and bypass Jane since the action shows Jane as being irrelevant and blocking something.
|