|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:26 AM Original message |
Fitzmas: Did Cheney implicate Bush's involvement in PlameGate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. or could "the Pres" = a cut-off reference to 'The Press' ie, Russert ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Capitalizing "press" ? That's unusual. Capitalizing "president" is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I think you're jumping to conclusions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. firedoglake transcript of courtroom discussions re "this pres" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
29. But Cheney spells "press" with a small "p" in his second line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Thanks! I missed the obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. What else does Cheney's note say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. I'll kick that. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
6. The phrase "this president" is unique to this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. I think it says, "THE guy THIS Pres" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. it says "THE guy THE Pres" - Cheney always dots his i's. It is possible that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I think you're right about "the guy the pres", but I disagree about the sequence he wrote it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. yes, I agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
9. republicans can't spell...."rediculous" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
10. Watch for a pardon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Good call. After all, Libby didn't DEFY the Pres, Libby was FOLLOWING Bush's oreders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
36. Even many conservatives would be pissed if Libby gets pardoned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. If President, it only points out what we've already talked about - Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. that's why Miller won't say who else she heard 'the wife' from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
14. Not going to protect one staffer + sacrifice the guy (that) the Pres. asked to stick his head in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Precisely. Cheney was mad - "the Pres" had approved PlameGate, but when the shit hit the fan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
17. definitely some slippage -- Defense Counsel MUST explore this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
18. Remember what Bush told Petreaus (sp)?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. What I find pretty interesting is that he just "kind of" scratched out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
21. On the question of whether Cheney wrote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. Another possible take: Cheney went too far & backed off. Bush didn't "ask" Libby to leak, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. That could be true, but then, who authorized Rove to leak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. The "meatgrinder" quote and the note came up again today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
26. Which Freep BA asshat wrote the "rediculous" part? THAT"S HUGH!!1!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
27. Or could Rove be the one protected and the Pres sacrificed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
31. KICKING for those bitching about truthout - same info de-leopoldized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
32. "because of the incompetence of others" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. Wow, this note was brought up yet again at the end of today's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I gotta admit I'm having a hard time following the current line of discussions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. The discussion that ensued last thing today was actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. Tim Man, this is excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC