Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dewey vs Truman redux?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 10:48 PM
Original message
Dewey vs Truman redux?
Edited on Tue Aug-31-10 10:56 PM by nadinbrzezinski




Well now we have Murckowsky (sp)pushed out by the certain brand of crazee the GOP is running this year.

Add to that the fact that polls are not reaching quite a bit of the population, no land line, no pollster will bug you, and I have slammed down my phone on them.

Realize the polls in 1948 were all kinds of wrong regarding Trumman-Dewey, because MOST people did not have phones. These days the wrong phones are getting reached.

My gut tells me that when all is said and done the talking heads will eat their words, and the democrats will keep both houses. Yes, been thinking about this, and think about it this way...

Reid should have gone down... but Angle is a special brand of crazee... better vote for the bad Dem than the crazee that is truly scary.

I've seen the Boxer Fiorina polls, but even in this town I've heard REPUBLICANS angry at her for trying to buy it... (and boxer has not started spending yet)... oh and the Governors job, same story. Oh and like Alaska... the GOP has closed primaries, and in California 55% of voters are indies, while in Alaska that is over 70%.

I think we may be heading for a Dewey Trumman scenario. No, not because Dems are stellar (some are, I love Boxer)... but because the other side is truly fielding the crazee...

The consequences if I am right will be interesting, perhaps even dangerous. (See Sharon's statement about Second Amendment Remedies), but that is a risk I'm willing to take.

Oh and Rove being annoyed that Obama acted Presidential... well he knows his boss started the war and this guy just accomplished a promise... that ain't good for ya if you are a Republican... in the real world. And yes, I do hope my gut is right on this, but for a while polls have been increasingly unreliable... I think we've reached the point of MOE above statistical error... which is ... what happened in Dewey vs Trumman.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. We can work for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you may have something there
I talk to people every day , out in the world, once I get away from the Trading Floor and WSJ types.
There are LOTS of PO'd people, but most of them think that the tea party is fucking crazy. And return the car to the morons that drove it off the cliff? Really? In what world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You know it is bad
when even the local curmudgeon admits the tea party is wrong... and crazee. (And that is purely anecdotal) But they scare him... he was a card carrying member UNTIL he went to a couple events...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would add it's a generic poll
If you said to me today, "Are going to vote Democratic or Republican in the 2010 election" I'd say Democratic.
If the choices were Zell Miller (D) or Lincoln Chafee (R) I'd vote for Chafee because he's not crazy.

They should ask, if the Republican was a Tea Bagger would you vote for him or her?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well the generic been done for a while
but this is going to be interesting in all kinds of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Maybe so
But these numbers have become very different once the candidate in announced (especially when it's a tea party crank). Harry Reid is one of the best examples. The Kentucky Senate race is another.

In the past, most of the people running were fairly generic and did not espouse the things that the Tea Party is pushing everywhere.

So, IMLHO, a generic poll is a waste of time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kringle Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush, was the best thing the Dems had in '06 and '08
not sure about '10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's been replaced by the special brand of crazee that is
Edited on Tue Aug-31-10 11:06 PM by nadinbrzezinski
the Tea Party.

When miller says... SS is not Constitutional and needs to be abolished, how do you think seniors will vote in Alaska? Statistically they vote more often in off year elections.

And that is not just Miller either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Murkowski conceding to Miller
was the best possible thing that could have happened for Alaska Democrats. With very, very little statewide name recognition, Scott McAdams only trailed Joe Miller by 8 points -- and that was BEFORE all the "oldest profession" tweets and Miller's car wreck in Fairbanks on election day and all the histrionics of the past few days. Murkowski's people are NOT going to flock to Miller -- I just don't see it happening.

I just love the thought of Alaska with two Democratic senators. And maybe even a Democratic governor. What a concept!

Like Shannyn Moore says, "painting a red state blue one stroke at a time." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah but I think we are going to be ahem
surprised nation wide. Ok, not us paying attention... the talking heads on the TV.

The ongoing narrative has been way off...

Oh and a blue AK will be nice to see.

Hell, correct me if I am wrong, but early reps to the House and Senate were Dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, you are correct.
Alaska was strongly Democratic in the early days of statehood, and we have one of the most progressive and, dare I say it, socialist state constitutions in the country. It's a wonderful constitution, full of all kinds of privacy protections and allowing for citizen ownership of the resources.

The Alaska territorial legislature passed a civil rights law in 1945, 20 years before the national Civil Rights Act. Individual rights and liberties have always been very important here.

Miller is too exclusionary, too mean, actually, to gain much support here. He appeals to a certain fundy base -- but Alaska ranks 49th in the country for religiosity. That stuff just doesn't sell here.

I feel good about November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That makes two of us
and not just about Alaska.

I will enjoy the Dewey defeats Truman moment...

I really will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. me too....i feel great about the dems! it isn't 1993! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. Repugs are easily mislead
McSame thought he was going to get angry Hillary Clinton voters because he paid too much attention to the MSM. The narritive "do you really want to give these guys back the keys to the car?" is about to be heard and heard alot. The time to dissect and dismantle what they are proposing has commenced. It is still entirely possible for the repugs to lose this one badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. I hope so...I mean, I don't intend to vote for the Democratic party at this point,
but I sure as hell will vote against the Republicans.

Not that I even have a vote this year, living in DC, but I would guess there are a great many like me throughout the country. Just because the loonies make a lot of noise does not mean they are converting reasonable people to their poorly articulated (but clearly insane) position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC