Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow Is NOT Happy With Obama’s Kind Words For Former President Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:39 AM
Original message
Rachel Maddow Is NOT Happy With Obama’s Kind Words For Former President Bush
Rachel Maddow Is NOT Happy With Obama’s Kind Words For Former President Bush

by Glenn Davis | 10:21 pm, August 31st, 2010


The backlash to President Obama’s Oval Office Iraq speech has begun – and so far, one of the toughest critics is Rachel Maddow. Maddow talked with Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann in the speech’s immediate aftermath, and reserved especially harsh judgment for Obama’s praise of former President George W. Bush.

Maddow shared this sentiment while the three like-minded pundits discussed a question from Olbermann about whether the speech was “too much in the middle.” Matthews responded first, by saying Obama is in the middle, which he called “a hard thing to do, to go to the center on a war.” Matthews did, however, say that “there very few arguments made for this war that were ever held out to be true, ever” – while noting his, Olbermann’s, and Maddow’s “pretty smart view on this war from the beginning.”

Olbermann then read aloud Obama’s complimentary words for Bush:

“This afternoon, I spoke to former President George W. Bush. It’s well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset. Yet no one could doubt President Bush’s support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security.”

…to which Maddow said:”I think we shouldn’t get past how remarkable it is, how much the proponents of the Iraq war are getting off easy.” She went on to rip “the recklessness with which President Bush discarded…national security in favor of this war of choice, which only diminished our security, and then, the big finish:

“To talk about having a demonstrated commitment to our security, having started this war on the terms on which he started it – I mean, it’s beyond restraint from president Obama, and anyone in the pro-Iraq war, pro-Bush camp who doesn’t feel like they’ve been given the greatest political present they never deserved was not listening to this speech.”

-edit-

http://www.mediaite.com/online/rachel-maddow-criticizes-obamas-kind-words-for-bush/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. no thinking person could be happy with that
it's a fucking disgrace; totally unncessary and just another fucking stick in the eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Stick in the eye." I watched in disbelief, horror and sadness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. the worst thing is - Obama did not believe what he was saying
it was very clear to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stardust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. I'm still trying to figure out why he even bothered mentioning Bush.
Didn't he say he talked to him on the phone today? :eyes: Maybe he apologized to Bush for ending his precious war. Obama bending over backwards is getting very old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Ending? You are FUNNY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Especially when you consider how much the world knows about Bush crimes, they were listening too.
Bad enough for the domestic, I mean homeland, audience. Half of us are brainwashed anyway.
But for the world to hear it is surreal.
They must be asking: who do you think you're kidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. No 'shock and awe' here - he played it exactly as I thought he would.
If any charges are made against Bushco in court - it
Won't be in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Now The Hague is obligated to take on Bush/Cheney.
Once it's determined a state can't or won't control its own rogues, The Hague has the mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Declaring "Victory"...
History will be the ultimate judges. While I'd prefer a judge at the World Court to make a judgement (and lots of indictments), seems the US and the world (except for those whose lives were shattered) wants to "move on"...get away from this ugly war without totally getting away from it. This isn't a withdrawl...just a draw down and the questions as to why this conflagration happened in the first place has long since been muddled over by a complicit corporate media that profited from this war as well as politicians in both parties who have blood on their hands. It's sickening as by avoiding the real lessons of this "pre-emptive" invasion it opens the door for it to happen again in the future. Once the executive gets power, it rarely gives it back...and the unitary executive model has all but been codified...all we can do is hope for a benevolent executive not to play that card. The Congress has totally abrogated its power to declare war and we now have an imperialistic foreign policy that enables any "leader" to determine they can invade when it suits the "national interest" or "security". No need to prove it, their word is all that's needed.

Sadly we now have an executive who is assisting in the rewriting of history...another opportunity squandered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Change the name to Caesar and be done with it.
The Romans learned that lesson the hard way. Why can't the legislative branch learn from History? The Executive surely has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Empire = Riches
You keep the masses occupied with bread, circuses and "tea parties" and quietly go and count your cash. I don't think the Executive has learned a thing rather than the next time to pick a more "winnable" war. We see our entire government corrupted with corporate cash...especially from the large corporate welfare queens who turn billions of our tax dollars into thousands and millions in campaign contribution. Add to that a corporate media that thrives on the same money and has long demonized those who try to look under the hood as being "unpatriotic". For the thousands of families (many poor) whose lives have been shattered by this war for profit there are a bunch of very happy fat cats who will continue to get their billions in defense contracts and the beat goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Like your name states it's karma but of the bad kind and
will bite our asses at some point. And everyone who has enabled this to happen who could have done otherwise (like Nancy Pelosi) are complicit and accountable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Yet no one could doubt...." Snort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. LOL, that leaves out most everyone I know nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Just call me 'no one'
'Cause I not only doubt, I know better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Me either
Rachel is one smart cookie - and she's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well she certainly isn't alone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama should be prosecuting the little turd from Crawford.
Instead, he's acting as if lying America into two illegal, immoral and unnecessary wars is, uh, normal. W.T.F?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. WTF??? I can't believe he mentioned B*sh with even faint praise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. ''Now, it is time to turn the page.''
Edited on Wed Sep-01-10 09:09 AM by Octafish
Sorry. I can't -- and I won't, not for government spying on Americans, torture, warmongering and treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Well, we're not getting that trillion back.
That page is already turned, and we're still on the way to two trillion.

Even a world that could prosecute the war pigs wouldn't be able to put the various Humpties together again. Sadly, I understand that letting the perps walk is just a given on our planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Of all of the countless sentences that have come out of the President's
mouth, this one about Bush was the worst. What in the living hell did he think he was accomplishing by complimenting the worst President in history, referring to a war criminal as supporting the troops that he had sent in harms way for his own gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wouldn't ya love to be the fly on the wall?
Maddow gets invited to the WH every once and a bit for one of these "off the record" chats. Wouldn't you love to have been the fly on the wall if she got invited after this speech? All this "turn the page" crap is just enabling the next senseless war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. No more "turning the corner", we are now turning the page ...
Edited on Wed Sep-01-10 07:21 AM by Billy Burnett
... tearing it out of the book and tossing it down the Memory Hole.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. The pretense that it was about 'national security'. Yuck. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stardust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Rachel was spot on with this comment (and then had to go and diminish it with
an apology to Keith later for "filibustering.") :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. She was spot on the money...
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. Obama hit a new all time low, and that is not easy for him
He praises Bush, demands that no one doubt the motives of Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. the changing of the history books as begun.
revisionism just doesn't happen by people who lie, it also happens by people who don't challenge.

No prosecutions means no record of accountability. No accountability means no long term repercussions. No long term repercussions means no entry into the historical record. No entry into the historical record means nothing happened. years from now, when we are dead, moron will be looked upon as a hero because what needed to be done, wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. And to no one's surprise, the war proponents are still griping...
John McCain: "a real lack of generosity of spirit."

John Cornyn: Our success in Iraq has everything to do with the hard work of our men and women in uniform, the Iraqi people, and President Bush's resolve. It has nothing to do with President Obama's campaign promise to carry out the previous administration's plan for returning US troops from Iraq."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9055528


You know what happens when you offer an olive branch to an elephant? He takes it, eats it, and expects more. Usually while crapping on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. You hit the nail on the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
30. knr - WH comment line - (202) 456-1111...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
33. Do repub presidents ever praise democratic presidents?
Aside from JFK? Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
35. This country is not becoming corrupt. It's long past that.
Our government is morally corrupt and the teabaggers want to solidify it as long as it looks like the pre-civil rights days when no black man could dream of being President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. Maddow is only in her mid-30s. She is a brilliant journalist.
She will get far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC