Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government won't sue Moody's credit rating firm for criminal fraud despite finding evidence!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:05 PM
Original message
Government won't sue Moody's credit rating firm for criminal fraud despite finding evidence!
SEC won't pursue Moody's fraud case
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
September 1, 2010


Moody's, one of three major credit-rating firms that misjudged many of the securities at the center of the financial crisis, escaped legal action Tuesday when federal regulators said they would not sue the company for fraud despite finding evidence that the firm misled investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Moody's executives discovered they had issued overly optimistic ratings but decided not to correct them out of concern that "downgrades could negatively affect Moody's reputation."

The SEC said it chose not to file suit because of "jurisdictional" limitations. The activities at the center of the SEC investigation took place in Europe, beyond the agency's reach at the time.

But the agency said it might have made a different decision under the terms of the legislation enacted this summer to overhaul financial regulations. The bill gave the SEC the power to sue credit-rating firms engaged in "otherwise extraterritorial fraudulent misconduct."

"Moody's is pleased that this matter has been resolved and that the commission determined the investigation should be closed without pursuing any enforcement action," Michael Adler, a Moody's spokesman, said Tuesday.

The big three firms - Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings - have faced far less regulatory and legal action than banks and other financial firms implicated in the meltdown. Federal regulators haven't sued any of the credit-rating firms. And the new financial regulatory law does not require an overhaul of the industry.

Read the full article at:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/31/AR2010083106192.html

If one didn't know better one would think that Wall Street is calling the shots in the SEC. Duh .... BBI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Moody's will continue to serve. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad they didn't take place in Yemen or Pakistan
Then the SEC could call in a drone strike on Muddy's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course not
the government is one of the collaborators in the crime, why would they prosecute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. one would think that Wall Street is calling the shots in the SEC.
The whole government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Over a trillion* dollars in bailouts, and not one exec in prison.
Sounds like the dope sellers filling our prisons are just guilty of thinking too small.

(Madoff and Stanford weren't bailout recipients.)

* I just made the trillion number up... with over $700B in TARP alone, I'm sure the real numbers are much higher. And that doesn't include stimulus money, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wall Street? Nah. Try Omaha
Not that there is anything wrong with that...


:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shrug - that's just an example change we got from hope.
At this point you can only laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Moody is pleased and that's all that matters in this world.
Most people are just chum to the puppetmasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC