Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The test score witch-hunt in LA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
another saigon Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 07:09 AM
Original message
The test score witch-hunt in LA
http://socialistworker.org/print/2010/09/02/test-score-witch-hunt-in-la

Jessica Kochick, a teacher in the Los Angeles Unified School District, looks at the anti-union agenda behind "value-added" evaluation of teacher performance.

September 2, 2010

THE SCHOOL year in the Los Angeles Unified School District is about to kick off--with two unpaid furlough days due to budget cuts and union concessions--and teachers and parents are grappling with a debate over a recent Los Angeles Times article "Who's Teaching L.A.'s Kids?" <1>

The article unveils a study of individual teacher effectiveness in LAUSD, based on a "value-added measure"--meaning how much "value" an individual teacher has added to a student's expected yearly growth as measured by California standardized reading and math tests. If a student's test scores improve compared to his or her peers, the teacher has "added value"; if the student's percentile ranking drops, the teacher is deemed ineffective.

The Times published online the "effectiveness" of approximately 6,000 elementary school teachers, including their names, rankings and places of employment. This unethical move has already led to division, humiliation and mistrust among teaching staffs overburdened by layoffs and overcrowded classrooms. Parents, in turn, face a confusing set of results, often discovering that their favorite teacher has been deemed "ineffective."

Ramon Cortines, superintendent of LAUSD, has stated that he would like a value-added measure to make up at least 30 percent of a teacher's evaluation. Not coincidentally, this is the percentage required on the Race to the Top grant application--the federal, competitive program that gives education money to states in exchange for punitive accountability measures.

California did not qualify this year for Race to the Top money. LAUSD was competing for about $120 million, not nearly enough to close its budget deficit.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE VALUE-added model is very controversial. Respected research from both the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences point to the instability of the results.

In several studies, up to 35 percent of individual teachers moved from the most effective group to the least effective group (or vice versa) from one year to the next. The researchers conclude that these statistical models should not be used for high-stakes decisions, like firing teachers or awarding merit pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. But such testing and assessing has proven very valuable to those who want to privatize education,
This includes our president and Sec of Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Union membership nationally is down to 12.1 %.
Busting these pesky teachers' unions might accomplish what had in the past been a mere RW pipe dream: national average of BELOW 10%.

In a related development, Sec. Duncan says he's not worried if GOP takes control of congress. He can work with *anyone*. (Today's NYT).

I believe he's actually telling the truth about that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Why would he worry about Repbulicans when he is doing their bidding already? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. the LA Time is going out of business soon - not enough "value added" despite price hikes lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC