Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mariner Energy Cited For Two Violations In Past Six Months, Totaling $55,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 03:25 PM
Original message
Mariner Energy Cited For Two Violations In Past Six Months, Totaling $55,000
Mariner Energy Cited For Two Violations In Past Six Months, Totaling $55,000
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/09/02/mariner-safety-lapses/

A mile-long oil sheen is now reportedly visible where an offshore oil and gas platform exploded this morning in the Gulf of Mexico. The Vermilion Oil Rig 360, owned by Mariner Energy — which was recently purchased by Apache Corp. — was producing about 58,800 gallons of oil and 900,000 cubic feet of gas per day.

As ThinkProgress noted, just yesterday Mariner Energy said the Obama administration’s moratorium on offshore drilling is “trying to break us.” Mariner Energy also made a recent filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission saying its operations “may be impacted in the future by increased regulatory oversight, which may increase the cost of” Outer Continental Shelf wells “and delay drilling and production therefrom.”

But if today’s explosion wasn’t enough evidence, government safety records indicate that Mariner Energy and Apache Corp. are desperately in need of regulation. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s Outer Continental Shelf Civil/Criminal Penalties Program cited Mariner Energy for two violations just in the first six months of this year, and once more in 2007.

A summary of the fines assessed against Mariner Energy:

– Two violations in 2010, totaling $55,000.

– One violation in 2007, for $30,000.

Apache Energy has been cited for 22 violations since 1998, totaling over $1.74 million in fines, including a $435,000 fine this year for removing a key piece of equipment from a sump system, which then “could not automatically maintain oil at a level sufficient to prevent discharge into the Gulf of Mexico.”

A summary of the fines assessed against Apache Corp.:

– Two violations in 2010, totaling $690,000.

– Two violations in 2008, totaling $135,000.

– Three violations in 2007, totaling $486,000.

– Five violations in 2006, totaling $216,000.

– Three violations in 2005, totaling $122,000.

– One violation in 2004, for $5,000.

– One violation in 2002, for $13,000.

– Four violations in 2001, totaling $70,000.

– One violation in 1999, for $6,000.

Mariner Energy is probably right that the company will be “impacted” by “increased regulatory oversight.” But its workers, and the Gulf ecosystem, might avoid being impacted as they were today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. And so many of these companies find it cheaper to just pay the fines.
To hell with safety. To hell with the cost to the environment. They make so much money, they'll just pay the fines and ignore the rules and regulations.

BP has over 700 safety violations listed. BP is a convicted felon. What is it going to take to reign in the out of control oil companies?

Hell, what is it going to take to reign in the out of control corporations, period?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC