Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we were serious about winning in November we would

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:36 AM
Original message
If we were serious about winning in November we would
end the rule requiring 60 votes in the Senate and pass the 400 bills the House has passed before the election.

In the tradition of "New Deal", "Give'em Hell" and the "Great Society."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. And then when the Democrats are in the minority,
And we know they will be at some point, we will watch in horror as the 'Pugs ram through legislation after piece of terrifying legislation with no chance at all of fighting back or preventing disaster.

Rather than continuing to wring our hands about sixty votes, let's work with majorities we have. Force the 'Pugs to carry out a real live talk all night, pee in a bottle filibuster while the Dems, including Obama, use the bully pulpit to beat them about the head and shoulders for their obstructionism. It has worked before, it can work now, and if the Dems do this a couple of times, I guarantee you that 'Pugs will suddenly be less obstructionist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or is it all a smokescreen, covering for corporate/monied dominance of the system? n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ding-ding-ding-ding-ding! We have a winnah!
Plausible deniability, and it works every time:
"Golly, we just couldn't get our progressive legislation through with 60 votes, so we had no choice but to toe the RW line."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. BINGO! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. People need help now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. We didn't use the filibuster
when we were in the minority, so what's the point of preserving it if we're not going to use it?

If we had any intentions of using the filibuster, then Alito would not be on the Court right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's different. When Dems use it, it's a commie/pinko/liberal plot. When Repubs use it
it's for protection of God and country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Um--what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. We'd have the veto.
Not the ideal situation, but not the worst case scenario, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gophates Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. If we grew a pair and smacks these bastards in the face
like they deserve, we'd never be in the minority again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Senate Is Totally Dysfunctional...
...and the House isn't far behind. From now til the elections they won't go near anything that is controversial and if current trends continue I see the next two years of gridlock and temidity. The Democrats can barely get 50 votes for most bills in the Senate yet alone the 60 or 67 needed for any major legislation. While it'd be great to bust the fillibuster, many here may feel a lot different should the GOOP win control of the Senate and start trying to push bills with 51 votes.

It's too late in the game to try any changes...the corporate media would be all over it (faux having a shitstorm supreme) and we saw with the "success" of health insurance reform and semi-bank regulation how slow things move and how many hands try to get into the pie. With all the corporate money corrupting the political system, it's only a "great" society if you write big checks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Here's what I don't get, we are so f..king afraid of what the repubs will do to us
yet we won't do the same to them. You know damn well they aren't afraid of us. We are effectively neutered by our own thinking!

We could get a ton of progressive legislation pasted before Nov and show America we have care about the economy and jobs and education. We could then maintain control and keep on doing the same.

What we will get is watered down bills and then repubs passing their shit like the last 8 years.

I will never understand the willingness to do nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Have Reid call the Senate into session.
Bring each of the 400 bills up for a cloture vote.

After that, bring up each one that got filibustered a second time.

Then a third.

Then a fourth.

Then a fifth.

Let the people see where the fault lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. +best answer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. And if by chance the repubs do win...
then we'll be stuck with majority rules in the Senate full of repubs...do you really want that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Funny, we fear the right so much we sit on our asses and cower in the corner.
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 11:12 AM by county worker
We have the White House, the Senate and the House. History will note that during this time the Dems could do nothing about unemployment, the economy, real health care reform, real education reform, the deficit, tax reform because though they controlled the government the opposition party was more powerful out of office!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yeah I know
they should be doing what the repubs do when they can't get something through...look for little used rules or legal loopholes...they always seem to find ways...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC