Palin now knows who THATCHER was.Will hate DARWIN until she finds out about HAWKING!1

[UTUSN]

It's said that when she recently heard about that THATCHER woman being a famous wingnut type, she wanted to meet her!1 What a photo op that would make, a wingnut female icon passing something-or-other to the New WingWoman in Town!1 They had to tell her this wasn't possible because of some dementia or other, not clear whether on THATCHER's part or on Bailin'PALIN's. Oh, well, things gotta keep moving right along!1 So some dude named DARWIN hasn't been hot in the news much lately, so she hasn't had to do the Twitter on him--was he on "Bewitched"?!1 But when she hears about his "evolution" stuff, he's sure to be in her gunsights, oh if she actually hunted and stuff. But there's a lot of catching up to do, because the DARWIN has been accepted by *some* religious types, so now there's this bigger fish to fry--dang, if she actually did some fileting (does TAWKIN' about stuff mean you actually have to DO it?!1) : This HAWKING freak is sort of wiping out the last vestige of work-around about Gawd and His starting the whole ball of wax rolling, so he's GOT to be dealt with before he infects all of Bristol's children with unpatriotic ideas!1 And what's with his face and that wheelchair?!1 Is he Special Needs or something?!1 After her ONE contact with Special Needs because of her ONE kid, they seem to be EVERYWHERE!1




**********QUOTE********

http://gawker.com/5629013/stephen-hawking-proves-god-doesnt-exist-in-new-book-or-something

Stephen Hawking's New Book Proves God Doesn't Exist, Or Something

Stephen Hawking's new book, The Grand Design, is a nuanced analysis of the intertwining of metaphysics and physics through the ages. But all anyone wants to talk about is that the book says God wasn't needed to create the Universe.
In a passage excerpted in the Times of London, Hawking wrote: ....

Oh my (unnecessary) God! This has sparked outrage in England, where there seem to be entire television channels dedicated to the tiresome battle between boorish scientific critics of religion like Richard Dawkins and whatever person with a funny hat is currently defending God/Allah/G-d/whatever.

But Stephen Hawking is not a sophomore philosophy major debating his buddies while stoned in the Quad, and his argument is actually much more sophisticated than this out-of-context paragraph suggests. According to Alan Boyle at MSNBC: ....

Basically it seems Stephen Hawking's argument is normative—it's about how to study the universe—rather than descriptive. He... sorry, we just dozed off for a second. This is boring... let's get back to the "there is no God" stuff!

(Photo via Getty)



Send an email to Adrian Chen, the author of this post, at [e-mail].

********UNQUOTE********

[mike r]

1. Sarah will freak out when she sees English money:

[stuntcat]

6. aw, nice!

Animals and Darwin on the monies!!! Wish I lived in a country that thought that stuff was important.

[HopeHoops]

2. "Hawkin's? Them thar's the birds ya shoot from a heliochopper. Them's good eats!"

"Todd roasts 'em on tha grill with 'Publican BBQ sauce and we eats 'em with freedom fries from McD's!"

[asjr]

3. I'm sure Sarah thought Thatcher was someone

in Britain that patches roofs.

[mikeytherat]

4. "Thatcher" is Palin-speak for "Is that your..."?

As in, "Thatcher dress? It sure is ugly!"

mikey_the_rat

[asjr]

5. You Betcha!