Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHY Tea Baggers Hate Firemen. No, It Isn't What You Think.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:46 AM
Original message
WHY Tea Baggers Hate Firemen. No, It Isn't What You Think.
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 11:52 AM by McCamy Taylor
If you thought Tea Baggers were about less taxes and no healthcare for Blacks , you were wrong. Everyone knows by now that the Tea Parties are the baby of the Koch Family, a private oil company. Their real agenda is No Cap and Trade . That is why you see Tea Baggers who do not know what Cap and Trade is carrying signs that say they are against it.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7wcvGbg9_yI/SlDrNf4lQ9I/AAAAAAAAAlo/q2TE_R7YSNk/s400/Yes+for+Cap+and+Trade.jpg


Obama was elected with the support of the so called clean energy industries. He promised to deliver Cap and Trade. Cap and Trade is very, very good for clean energy, which can sell its pollution “credits”. And it is very, very bad for Big Oil, which is a major polluter.

http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/bret_boteler_on_oil_gas/archive/2009/04/30/tax-dodge-cap-and-trade-would-harm-consumers-and-the-oil-industry.aspx

Red Cavaney, senior vice president for government, public affairs at ConocoPhillips, also testified in front of the US House Energy and Commerce Committee. He said, quite accurately, that refineries would have to spend an estimated $68 billion under a $25/ton carbon tax, mostly from collections of end-users' carbon taxes in addition to levies on refiners' greenhouse gases under the measure.


Cost refineries $68 billion? We can’t have that!

When the Kochs decided to do a little Astroturfing, they knew that No Cap and Trade would not fire up the public imagination. So they played a game of Bait and Switch. They got the press interested by focusing on health care reform, the hot topic in Washington. That was the Bait.

Now the Switch. From Sept 1:

http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/anti-cap-and-trade-rally-planned-manhattan

Anti-cap-and-trade rally planned in Manhattan


Remember how Bush promised No gay marriage in 2004 and then tried to deliver Privatized Social Security in 2005? This is more of the same. Tea Baggers have been duped. They are suckers for the oil industry. They walk the pavement of America’s big cities, so that the Koch Family can post bigger profits.

Tea Baggers are also fools.

When the right proclaimed that public health insurance would mean the end of life as we know it on this planet, some liberals pointed out that other public services work just fine. Services like those provided by fire fighters.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tina-dupuy/firefighting-in-the-1800s_b_247936.html

But instead, today firefighters are national heroes. They're organized, quick, competent and with few exceptions pillars of the community. Their duty is to protect people and their property and they do it. They make no profits, are part of the government and they help people 24-hours a day. They even let seniors live. No debate necessary. What started out as a shady gaming of the system where the general public's welfare was at risk is today something of national pride.
So government can do something right. It's happened.


The left began to make fun of the Tea Baggers. Check out this very funny video called Privatize the Fire Department

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bb8qG76L9jE

And check out this bit of political satire:

1. For too long now, fire departments across the United States have been SOCIALIST organizations, resulting in TAXES on the American people.
FACT: Most Americans never use the socialized services of the fire department. We have the best fire departments in the world in the US, but that doesn’t mean that anyone (even non-US citizens) should be able to dial up and have fires put out, etc. There are private companies (Halliburtion, Etc.) who could step in tomorrow and take over every fire department in America and charge the consumer directly.
This is AMERICA. NO FREE FIRE SAFETY.
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in asbestos and carrying a fire hose.”

http://www.fromthecapitol.com/sacramento-tea-party-rally-1734/comment-page-1#comment-2028

Very funny. And persuasive. The right knew it was in trouble. So, a month after the Huffington Post article the Heritage Foundation fired back with:

How Success of Private Fire Departments Undermines ObamaCare


http://blog.heritage.org/2009/08/26/how-private-fire-departments-success-undermines-obamacare/

If this seems illogical, take it up with the right wing, not me.

Now, loyal Tea Baggers feel obligated to bad mouth fire fighters, who have been linked in the public mind with the health care debate. They believe that if they can persuade Americans that firemen are bad, that will mean that universal health care is also bad. And if Americans can be convinced that they will live longer, happier lives without health care, then the Koch Family and Big Oil will not have to worry about paying any penalties under Cap and Trade. In other words firemen are overpaid and lazy equals No Cap and Trade .


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Edited. K&R.
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 11:56 AM by Brickbat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ok, ok. We are now Lovelaceless. Folks will just have to wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank you...
Still a very good post!:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. I oppose cap and trade
It is a giveaway to Wall Street speculators looking to inflate the next bubble with their carbon credit sales.

If Goldman Sachs likes this policy, then there must be something wrong with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And according to the President -
"You know, when I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, uh, you know — Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."


I don't know about the rest of the folks here, but my electricity rates are plenty high already. Is this the type of change America voted for? I know I didn't vote for that kind of change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I think he left out "not"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedom fighter jh Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Yes. We need to do something about CO2 but . . .
. . . cap and trade may not be the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am opposed to the Cap nTrade scheme. I say have the EPA and OSHA enforce
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 12:33 PM by geckosfeet
environmental regulation and give them power to fine and prosecute.

C-n-T is a scheme designed to let the biggest polluters pay hush money to a select group of insiders rather than prosecuting them and demonstrating that they are destroying our environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, but whether you are right or wrong
you know why you are against it. That's a crucial difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. That sign is obviously fake
it's spelled correctly. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti2 Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am not surprised!
But, I find it incomprehensible to not like firemen. I had a
friend who hired off duty firemen in Chicago to help do
renovations in her home. She would leave her house key with
them and NEVER had a bit of trouble.
My gosh, If you can't trust a fireman there is no one left to
trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. I strongly oppose Cap and Trade.
Cap and Trade is another Wall Street scam, designed to allow heavy polluters to get away with their actions without bearing the costs.
Any costs of buying carbon credits will be passed on to the consumer. Wall Street will make bets for and against certain types of credits.
Cap and Trade is another naked derivatives market, which serves no positive purpose.
The EPA needs the full authority to enforce current regulations.

The Republicans have done the Democrats a favor by blocking Cap and Trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubicleGuy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nothing like a little bad wiring in the attic...
... which decides on a Sunday afternoon that it's time your house goes up in smoke (as did happen to us a little over 3 years ago) to put a little excitement into the day. And a little cotton in your mouth as you realize there's nothing you can do about it until the fire department shows up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedom fighter jh Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. I guess their next challenge will have to be the post office nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Teabaggers = Morons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. "We pay, they play"? Sounds like INSURANCE companies.
Wow. What stupid arguments. "We pay, they play." "Have a reporter follow them around and see how much work they actually do." Sheesh.

Why isn't this kind of criticism leveled at insurance companies? Come to think of it, the fire department isn't even earning a profit, yet, in essence, it's a socialized kind of "fire protection insurance." Actually, I think there's a case to be made here for precisely WHY health insurance should be provided by the government rather than for-profit organizations.

Just thinkin' out loud.

-----------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC