Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marijuana may not be the gateway drug some think it is, study finds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:32 PM
Original message
Marijuana may not be the gateway drug some think it is, study finds
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 12:38 PM by kpete
Source: Los Angeles Times

Marijuana is thought by some to be a gateway drug among young people who eventually go on to try stronger substances. But that may be the exception rather than the rule, a new study finds.

Researchers from the University of New Hampshire looked at data from a random group of 1,286 children, teens and young adults who were in Miami-Dade public schools in the 1990s. Among the study participants, 26% were African American, 44% were Hispanic, and 30% were non-Hispanic white.

They were asked about their substance use and about exposure to major events and traumas that occurred before age 13. Some questions included, "Did you ever fail a grade at school?", "Did your parents ever divorce/separate?" and "Were you regularly emotionally abused by one of your caretakers?"

Education played a role in use of other substances--those more likely to have used marijuana as teens and other drugs as young adults didn't graduate from high school or go to college. Employment factored in as well, since those who smoked pot as teens and were out of work after high school were more apt to use other drugs.



Read more: http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-marijuana-20100902,0,7726432.story?track=rss



"While marijuana use may serve as a gateway to other illicit drug use in adolescence, our results indicate that the effect may be short-lived, subsiding by age 21. Interestingly, age emerges as a protective status above and beyond the other life statuses and conditions considered here. We find that respondents 'age out' of marijuana's gateway effect regardless of early teen stress exposure or education, work, or family statuses," the researchers say.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100902073507.htm

Whether teenagers who smoked pot will use other illicit drugs as young adults has more to do with life factors such as employment status and stress, according to the new research. In fact, the strongest predictor of whether someone will use other illicit drugs is their race/ethnicity, not whether they ever used marijuana.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100902073507.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was NEVER true and nobody EVER thought it was except RW liars and the clueless media!
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 12:39 PM by Joanne98
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One Fly Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks Joanne
For saying what I was going to. The same shit for years and years and even with a thousand articles like this and studies or what have you these bastards will still never discuss ending this third war front. I actually bought my first legal pot in Colorado a week or so ago. It was an interesting feeling but now can grow it and they can't do a thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The real gateway drug: Mothers Milk!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Here you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pot's illegal status has more to do with exposure to other illegal drugs. That's just the nature of
the black market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly, it's the "If you liked that, try this" sort of thing
making it legal (sorry NOT illegal) here in Holland the harder drug use is significantly lower than in the US.

Literally, the only thing the reich wing here has is that it's immoral to use pot, and even then it's a weak argument.

Oh well, right wing whack jobs are the same everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Exactly. If pot were legal, we would not have criminals...
...selling it right next to hard drugs. The drug laws force people who only want marijuana into contact with people who want to sell hard drugs. The drug laws drive kids to buy pot from people who are also eager to sell meth, heroine, and pills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That is an inane and flawed argument, worthy of a freeper!
grats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. How so?
Does the illegal nature of pot not cause those who seek it to be exposed to other more dangerous drugs? It seems to make sense to me. All the more reason to legalize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. To say that anything will cause crime to go away is naive at best
The freepers look at things in black and white.
the world operates in rainbow shades across the spectrum.

some crime WILL go down, as things become legit. crimes related to acquiring said thing will evaporate (as it won't be illegal) and people wont be doing stupid things like flooring it when tehy see a cop.

Here you can simply stay in the coffee shops, or take it home, without worrying about looking over your shoulder or if your seller is a cop.

additionally there is revenue hat is never talked about around coffee shops, that is the supporting snack bars for people who are high, or just coming down.
The take away market in holland is very healthy.

does all crime associated with pot disappear? of course not, but the vast majority of that has nothing to do with the general public of buyers, but where the coffee shops get their supply from (technically, a coffee shop can only sell what it grows itself)

point being, you are looking at this as a black n white issue, which is something that should never be tolerated here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Who is saying that crime will go away?
We're suggesting that by eliminating marijuana prohibition, crime will likely go down.

I think we agree on the issue. I certainly wouldn't mind if the U.S. took the Holland approach and created something like your Coffee shops.

I don't see how I'm looking at this in b&w.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. The ellipsis (...) means the sentence is continued in the body...
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 03:56 PM by gulliver
...of the post. I think you may think I am saying "If pot were legal, there would be no criminals." But the sentence actually ends in the body of the post, so the full sentence I wrote is "If pot were legal, there would be no criminals selling it right next to hard drugs." There would still be criminals, but there would not be any illicit pot dealers selling marijuana and hard drugs side by side.

Sorry for the confusion. Not my day on post titles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. it was my gateway to experimentation
alcohol came before weed, but i TRIED hashish, nicotine, acid, mushrooms, quaaludes, speed, cocaine, and opium all after i smoked cannibus. so i suppose it was a gateway.

and after experimenting once or twice with these harder drugs, i stopped and walked back through the gate. my story is probably typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. If you tried alcohol first
then alcohol was your gateway to experimentation - even if you stopped all the other but still drink alcohol. One could argue that the first substance consumed in order alter consciousness is the gateway to all subsequent uses of mind/consciousness altering substances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I love how they have to do a study
to disprove something that was never proven. How pathetic must these scientists feel knowing that they are doing research to disprove propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, kpete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. I started on apirin and cola
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. I've never, not once thought to try anything else.
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's the gateway drug to junk food.
:rofl:

Mmmm, Doritos...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. One of everything please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. I always considered myself a poster child for it not being a gateway drug.
In my college days (and a bit after), I smoked a lot of pot. My senior year of college, I was stoned every single day (and I still graduated cum laude). I never ever touched another drug. I had friends who did all kinds of other drugs, and sometimes I was even with them when they did. I remember them bringing home a bunch of whippets in college, watching everyone do them, but I didn't touch one. Then in the eighties, everyone was doing a lot of coke. I've been in rooms with a pile of coke on the table. I went to parties that lasted all night long because everyone was doing coke all night long. I stayed up all night with them, which wasn't easy, but never touched the stuff. In these situations, friends would always say, "c'mon, do a line," and I didn't. The fact that I smoked pot did not cause me to want these other drugs. So I feel like I am proof that pot is not a gateway drug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC