Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Special Forces In Afghanistan Whining About Lack Of Helicopters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:48 AM
Original message
Special Forces In Afghanistan Whining About Lack Of Helicopters
unhappycamper note: Since the ‘Pentagon’ has ‘requested’ that I only post one paragraph from articles on Army Times, and Airforce Times, I’ve decided to give ya’ll an unhappycamper summary of the article and a link to the OP. To keep in that same (new) tradition, I will also do the same for for articles on Navy Times, Marine Corps Times, stripes.com and military.com.

To read the article in the military's own words, you will need to click the link.

(This space reserved for a legally correct snark dump.) It sure is beginning to smell like fascism.

unhappycamper summary of this article: Shit like this makes me ask "Why are we there?" My balls are bigger than your balls? My god is bigger than your god?

One would think that a $150 billion dollars a year in Afghanistan should be enough to give these guys a few choppers.



The frustrating episode was far from an isolated incident, say members of the special ops community who argue that such missed opportunities underscore the need for the commander of Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-Afghanistan to have his own sizable element of lift aircraft. Beyond a handful of helicopters, the commander of CJSOTF-A, which is composed largely of Special Forces and always led by a Special Forces colonel, has never had his own lift capability.

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/09/army-afghanistan-special-forces-want-more-helos-090510w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Being Air Mobile would cut down on IED incidents.
IEDs are cheap to make. SAMs would really drain their resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC