Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Next Economic Plan: Don't Use the S Word!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 08:43 AM
Original message
Obama's Next Economic Plan: Don't Use the S Word!
With the economic recovery sputtering and the midterm elections approaching, President Obama is considering additional tax credits and tax breaks, additional spending on clean energy and infrastructure — in other words, additional stimulus. But don't call it stimulus! In a recent Politico story about Obama's plans for "emergency fixes to stimulate the economy," the White House press office refused to comment on the scope "other than to say it won't be a 'second stimulus.'"

It's a strange situation. The White House believes the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 helped avoid a depression and end a recession, saving or creating about 3 million jobs so far. And most nonpartisan economists basically agree: the $787 billion package of tax cuts, state aid and spending projects helped stimulate economic activity in the short term, which is the whole point of fiscal stimulus. As I wrote in the magazine last week, the Recovery Act is also funding a range of innovative education, health care, transportation and energy policies that will transform the country in the long term.

Nevertheless, the stimulus has become a national punch line. Even Obama quipped on Thanksgiving that his annual pardon had saved or created four turkeys.

The unpopularity of the stimulus is no great mystery. The Administration marketed it as a jobs bill, the only way to prevent rampant unemployment. But rampant unemployment happened anyway. The White House says things would be even worse without the stimulus; the economy was hemorrhaging about 700,000 jobs a month before its shot of fiscal adrenaline, and it's slowly adding jobs now. That's true enough, but "not as awful as it would have been" is not the kind of catchphrase you can build a movement around. Most economists accept the counterintuitive Keynesian idea that government needs to loosen its belt when families and businesses are tightening theirs, but it's awful politics.

"It's hard to sell," says Jared Bernstein, chief economist for Vice President Joe Biden. "If you could show people the world without the Recovery Act, it would be a lot more popular."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2016194,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC