|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:20 PM Original message |
In Japan - Powell Points Finger Directly At Bush Admin (including himself) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. It was a steaming pile of manufactured bullshit, and Powell knew it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. yep. He did have precedent however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SusanaMontana41
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 06:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
59. Powell has his fingers in several war crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. Agree . . . outrageous . . . Colin Powell and Condi Rice on video ... "we'd have to invent enemies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cal33
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. We seem to forget that much of the time Powell was the only odd man out among |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. Time for war crimes trials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe it will dent the public consciousness this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly77
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. Don't think the American people can be blamed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
44. Actually . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
43. Powell also had to have known that Cheney was regularly visiting CIA --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Indeed. It COULD have been averted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 06:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. It was the Republican misinformation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. the Supreme Court could have refused to hear Bush v. Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. Biden could have proceeded honestly in the Clarence Thomas hearings .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. gee, looking after your legacy, colin? too late. you already murdered a million people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. So Powell admits to criminal activity, he should know all about cover ups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. +100 .nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. Powell should know all about cover ups.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. They are all tryiing to rewrite history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 12:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. a museum full of shiny turds waxed over by Conservative think-tanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. I believe that the intellegence people got rewarded for doing as told. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 06:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. And punished if they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
46. Cheney, in unprecedented behavior, was at the CIA almost daily . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 02:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
54. That's not the Cheney way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Tue Sep-07-10 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. Bush wanted war and used every excuse he could think up to get it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Long before cheney*/bush* stole the White House via Selection 2000, plans were already being made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I should have read all the way through the thread before posting. Like minds anyway, :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
47. Thom Hartmann was reporting the "carving up of the oil fields planning afterwards" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
48. Also keep in mind the fiasco which put ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
11. I don't believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
55. I partially agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
14. "The United States Would Not Have Gone to War" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Probably not. Gore was not champing at the bit for an opportunity to make his bones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
49. How long before Gore would have been gone and Lieberman would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
15. BS, for many reasons. Outrageous, actually. Almost every other sentence in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I suspect Powell is trying to rewrite history to soften the perception of his participation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly77
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I remember the speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. That he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lutefisk
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
41. Junior wasn't good at anything, including lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. His son has resurfaced on a 'bi-partisan' anti-net neutrality ad as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
50. Powell's son led the great communications heist and deregulation at FCC .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
27. anyone who had a half assed understanding of iraq... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Unfortunately, I believe that many, if not most, of the House and Senate KNEW Iraq did not have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Perhaps. But I think some were shown bogus "top-secret" intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I concur. "But the consequences of blowing the whistle could be deadly. Witness David Kelly." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Wed Sep-08-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. That's it in a nutshell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
51. PLUS we'd been bombing them for 20 years -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
33. blah blah blah goes the war criminal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
34. Yeah, right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. The "people" that backed cheney*/bush* were going to attack Iraq. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bulloney
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
36. When you let Cheney cherry pick raw, unvetted intelligence to make the case for war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
37. That's a good first step. I'm sure he'll become even more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. Lack of Intelligence? Pure BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose
![]() |
Thu Sep-09-10 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hey Colin - Fuck you eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 04:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
57. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
40. Everyone in that admin was complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
53. kick, but too late to rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
56. Name names, Sir. And while you're in a confessional mood, clear up My Lai. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
feslen
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
58. as much as I despise bush and his cronies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC