Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal judge continues to dis human embryonic stem cell research

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:15 AM
Original message
Federal judge continues to dis human embryonic stem cell research
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 01:16 AM by babylonsister
http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-stem-cell-ruling-20100907,0,5898361.story?track=rss

Federal judge continues to dis human embryonic stem cell research

September 7, 2010|5:45 p.m.


Last month, Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., threw the entire field of human embryonic stem cell research into doubt when he ordered the National Institutes of Health to stop funding research projects involving the cells. Since the cell lines are derived from young embryos – which are destroyed in the process – a law called the Dickey-Wicker Amendment prohibits the federal government from funding the research, he explained in a preliminary injunction that took the NIH and scientists across the country by surprise.

The Obama administration asked the judge to lift his injunction while the matter is sorted out in court. On Tuesday, Lamberth denied that request. The government plans to appeal, according to this report on the Nature website.

The latest ruling clears up at least a little bit of the confusion generated last month. For instance, Lamberth makes clear that with his injunction, he did not intend to stop federal funding for projects using human embryonic stem cell lines that were approved by President George W. Bush. That means that at least some experiments can continue undisturbed.

But legal experts who questioned the reasoning behind the original ruling are even more perplexed now. Writing on the Volokh Conspiracy blog, UCLA law professor Russell Korobkin explains the “logical inconsistency” of Lamberth’s argument.

He also points out that the two plaintiffs in the case – researchers who say the Obama funding policy hurts them because it means they have to face stiffer competition when applying for NIH grants – are actually not affected at all. As reported by the Los Angeles Times, one of the scientists, James Sherley, won an NIH grant in 2010, a year after the suit was filed. The other researcher, Theresa Deisher, has never applied for a grant from the biomedical research agency, according to court filings.


-- Karen Kaplan/Los Angeles Times

Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. And yes, they DID say "dis'
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. We need to pass a law removing these restrictions.
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 01:43 AM by dkf
We did it before but it was vetoed by Bush. It beats me why we didn't take care of this earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 1000's..... tens of 1000's are waiting for possible cure and these assholes holds things UP? WTF??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Religion. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC