|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
sabra
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:56 AM Original message |
Obama camp has "frozen out" Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. Probably wise to freeze out FOX News, no matter who you are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twilight_sailing
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Let's face it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. yes, they deserve a permanent freeze-out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. I wish they all would avoid Fox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. It would be very interesting if they all took the pledge to freeze out Fox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
69. Everyone except for Biden, that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. Something all the Democrats should do in solidarity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. It is about time some of the Democrats put FAUX where they belong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
40. It's not like it is an actual *news* network. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Don't know why every Democratic candidate doesn't do this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Democrats can't win on Pox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. That's not entirely true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. And exactly HOW OFTEN is Wes on Fox? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I'd watch it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Why try? Even if Wes made them look stupid on 1 segment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Well, I'm sure if he runs, he won't be back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. Good, why give them any legitimacy - besides, their statement is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy M
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes, Fox News to reach out to all those voters in red and purple.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. Oooh....tough talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Yeah, if we're mean to FOX, their viewers might quit supporting black Democrats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
60. That is the statement that frosts me most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:01 PM Original message |
Good I wish everyone would freeze them out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. GOOD FOR OBAMA!!!! At least someone is being smart about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. ALL DEMOCRATS SHOULD FREEZE OUT FAUX NEWS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
33. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
18. No news for Nazis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. The problem isn't what you did wrong, Fox, but what you should have done right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
21. Excellent - the best way to treat a bully is to call them out and ignore them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adigal
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. And if he becomes President, he can yank their press passes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. I don't think he's going to win this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
37. It's Fox and Insight who screwed up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #37 |
59. Because they're lying dumbasses, that's why they haven't apologized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
66. This will have zero impact on his ability to compete in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
confludemocrat
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
27. "'I'm still in the freezer,' one Fox journalist said" Poor boy. Fox journalist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
28. Why would this be a problem for Fox? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
67. Right you are. Since when does Fox rely on mere FACTS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. Boohoo one fox "Journalist" you lay down with rabid dogs and you wake up with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
30. BRAVO, OBAMA! It takes GUTS to stand up to FOX! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HannibalBarca
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Fox Journalist..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connonym
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
32. Good on him. They're no more credible (or perhaps less so) than the National Enquirer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
34. Fox News Reporter. Talk about an oxymoron. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
35. Really? How much coverage did Fox and MSM give to the Repub. corruption? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
36. It's about time they were called out..K & R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
38. Cue the DU "Cry Me A River" String Quartet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
39. Good man. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
41. This presents an Opportunity for Hillary and my hunch is she will take advantage of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohinoaklawnillinois
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. How will this present an opportunity for Hillary?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #45 |
61. Well, this smears the Hillary camp, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Yeah, 'cause she could really make some headway with Fox's wingnut audience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
42. Well, it isn't like they've done much to HELP him, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllexxisF1
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
43. It'a about time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
44. Fox is the propaganda organ of the Republican Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skypilot
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
46. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
48. Hillary froze out ABC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meldroc
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
49. YES!!! Stick it to the Fox Noise Channel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samsingh
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
50. i don't know why Fox is crying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dancingme
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. Has anyone at Fox News apologized to Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
52. I think Fox overestimates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
53. If you're supposed to be a journalist and you're working for Fox, you've already done somethig wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
54. After their little "madrassah" stunt, I can't say as I blame him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
55. All Dems should do the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Yes! Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
56. A Fox Noise viewer wouldn't vote for Obama anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
57. "...Obama and his staff are in for a rude awakening ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
62. Democrats Can't Win Without Faux Noise? Yeah Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
63. here's hoping that more dems do the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thatsrightimirish
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
64. Just wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2008
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:00 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
65. Until there's an on-air apology and retraction from "Fox & Friends" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
70. Prediction. A funny situation on air will be the official unfreeze. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
71. Good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
72. They Think Too Highly Of Themselves At Faux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC