Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9th Circuit Court of Appeals throws Out Torture Victim's Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 08:08 AM
Original message
9th Circuit Court of Appeals throws Out Torture Victim's Case
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 08:33 AM by mmonk
on the basis of the State Secrets privilege and "national security".

Five foreign men who say they were kidnapped and tortured by the CIA cannot sue the Boeing Co. subsidiary that helped spirit them away for interrogations because of the risk of secret intelligence matters being exposed at trial, a sharply divided federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The decision in the closely watched case was a significant victory for the Obama administration because it recognized a president's power to protect wartime actions from judicial scrutiny by invoking the state secrets doctrine.

The civil rights lawyer who represented the alleged victims of the Bush administration's "extraordinary rendition" program said the ruling, if allowed to stand, means the United States has "closed its courtroom doors to torture victims."

The majority in the 6-5 ruling of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals "reluctantly" concluded that national security interests in the case were paramount to "even the most compelling necessity" to protect fundamental principles of liberty and justice.



-snip-


http://mobile.latimes.com/wap/news/text.jsp?sid=294&nid=21214417&cid=16677&scid=1854&ith=2&title=Top+Stories





The lawsuit was brought by Binyam Mohamed, the one who's torture included genital mutilation by razor blades.

It's official. The presidency has surpassed the power King George had when we rebelled against England. We live under an executive branch dictatorship because the executive branch can cite national security using the state secrets privilege and break our laws.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sad there is such little interest in the usurpation of our constitution
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 10:08 AM by mmonk
and the rule of law these days. I guess not many care about our founding concepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. This just makes me sick to my stomach! And who will fight for our constitutional rights when they
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 02:07 PM by flyarm
are all abolished? Under state secrets?????????

I feel so violated to have any constitutional rights destroyed!

and it is being done by BOTH Parties!

USA..I hardly know ye..

Democratic party..where are you?? What do you really stand for???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Read: Secrets trump liberty
It's as if the State has realized that by simply categorizing something as secret they can get away with anything.

And as long as we don't have any citizen representatives on the court bench these pernicious rulings will continue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, unfortunately.
Pretty sad. No indication of a working checks and balances system anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Note to the nitwits on the bench
We don't have any national security if we don't have liberty or justice. We are more vulnerable to attack than ever when we trim the Constitution to fit some specious claim of "national security," and our country deserves to be tossed onto the ash heap of history as another failed police state. The past is full of examples that the fall of the United States will not be pretty, and many of the people in power today will be treated the worst.

Enjoy your exalted position, boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC