Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Refuses To Say He'd Veto Extension Of Bush Tax Cuts For Wealthy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pgodbold Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 11:53 AM
Original message
Obama Refuses To Say He'd Veto Extension Of Bush Tax Cuts For Wealthy
When he pulls stuff like this it infuriates me beyond words. WTF is wrong with the man?

President Obama on Thursday refused to commit himself to vetoing legislation that would temporarily extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, even as he and his administration have steadfastly argued that such an extension would waste hundreds of billions of dollars.


Video and article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/09/obama-refuses-to-say-hed-_n_710279.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ofercrissake.... Unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Avoided the word "veto"
Just watched the video. It sounds like he is definitively saying he will not allow an extension of the tax cuts for the wealthy, but for some reason he wouldn't use the word "veto." Not sure what his strategy was or what he's trying to protect himself from. Oh, well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He won't commit
We've seen this before. I suspect it means he realizes he may have to sign an extension, and he doesn't want to say so before the election. Afterwards he'll say he never promised/campaigned/committed to their termination. Someone will call it a BFD and it will be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. That doesn't mean that he wouldn't veto it. He might see no profit
in threatening the veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. ...



Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Threatening a veto is like daring the Republicans.
Why invite trouble, imho. I'd like him to say it outright but can see why doing that would just be a provocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Neocons are going to do what they want to do - regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Neocons & Neolibs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Push it down the road?
It will probably be politically wiser to delay this issue and force the next Congress to deal with it. If the Republicans control Congress next year, it will be easier for Obama to pick a fight with them about extending the tax cuts for small businesses and the middle class, but NOT the cuts for the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. In other news, most NFL coaches refuse to disclose game plans to next weeks' opponents.
Some people just...don't...get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. White House: No Veto Will be Needed Over Bush Tax Cuts
<snip>

"The White House says it is confident Congress can find the votes this year to pass legislation extending the Bush tax cuts that does not include an extension of those cuts for the wealthiest Americans, something Republicans are calling for.

They are so confident, in fact, that White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said today there is no need for the president to consider vetoing any potential bill that would give in to the Republicans' preferences."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20015994-503544.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC