Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shocker! Sen. Nelson (Ambiguous - NE) comes out for extending ALL Bush tax cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:41 PM
Original message
Shocker! Sen. Nelson (Ambiguous - NE) comes out for extending ALL Bush tax cuts
September 9, 2010 – Nebraska’s Senator Ben Nelson issued this statement today concerning a series of tax cuts enacted during the previous administration that are set to expire at the end of 2010. Senator Nelson cast a deciding vote in favor of those tax cuts.

“I support extending all of the expiring tax cuts until Nebraska’s and the nation’s economy is in better shape, and perhaps longer, because raising taxes in a weak economy could impair recovery.

“Continuing all of the tax cuts could provide certainty for families and businesses in Nebraska and nationwide. Today, many businesses are sitting on cash because of uncertainty, which is holding back economic development across America.

“Just like the stimulus package in 2009, it is imperative that we take actions to help the economy. I hate deficit spending, but some matters are so urgent that they can't wait. Such was the case with the stimulus package, which contained more than $300 billion in tax relief, and I believe the same holds true about the expiring Bush era tax cuts.

“That said, I’d like to see these tax cuts paid for as much as possible. We need to focus on reducing government spending and finding offsets, where we can, because that’s the fiscally responsible thing to do.

“The federal deficit’s real and Nebraskans tell me that while we need to revitalize our economy now, we must minimize adding to the deficit because it will drag our economy down and burden our children’s future.”

http://bennelson.senate.gov/press/press_releases/090910-01.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. this guy makes lieberman look like a bleeding heart progressive liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was just thinking..."Why the hell is that guy in the Democratic Party???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. We keep getting told to vote for ANYONE with a D by their name or it will get worse...
... And it gets worse anyway, because we refuse to clean up our own party.

Blind loyalty has a high price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. JUDAS
Off to the GOP tent with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Color me surprised.
As to why he stays in our party, he very much enjoys his position at the fulcrum of power. When Democrats are in the minority, he happily crosses party lines to enact "bipartisan" legislation. Remember the gang of six?
The other party appreciates him very much, and treats him accordingly.

When we hold the majority, he obstructs like no other, and must be coddled and pampered to get even the smallest concession.

It serves him well to stay where he is. It infuriates me to see his shortcomiings heaped on our President's head. I hate him with burning hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why bother disambiguating? Nelson of Florida will be joining him by Monday.
Even if Congress is craven and greedy enough to vote for this, the President must not sign it. Tax cuts for the filthy rich when so many are out of work ain't gonna play in Peoria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why does he not just become a Republican officially, and
spare us the headaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why just warm the bench when you can be one of the most powerful people in the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can hear it now...
Roughly translated it will be:
"Well, you know can't do anything about it. Gotta work with the Senate we have. So no choice but to sign it. I mean if it were up to ME we wouldn't extend them for the wealthy. I mean I'm against it, but goshdarnit the votes just aren't there. Damn you Nelson. DAMN YOOOOOUUUUU!............o.k. see you when I'm out there campaigning for you in the Democratic primary."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. All it takes is one "Democrat" to filibuster and it won't pass
Obama won't have to sign a bill if there isn't one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The bill will be put through with all brackets extended....
Nobody will call out the deficit hypocrites.
Because they won't want to be seen as "raising taxes" (because god forbid Democrats should get out in front of a narrative and dictate the terms by explaining it how it really is.

The bill will go to Obama's desk with all the brackets (including the wealthiest) extended. The excuse given will be that they didn't want to burden the middle class with a "tax increase" so if the price to pay is extending the upper bracket as well then so be it. And the justification to the base will be some variant of what I originally posted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. He makes no sense! Wants to reduce the deficit but won't accept taking in more money to reduce
the deficit. I will bet the house that he will be for cutting social security and medicare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He only wants to cut the deficit related to spending that helps the bottom 98% of us.
I'm sure he feels we should cut all those nasty social programs to make sure the deserving rich are not inconvenienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What gets me is that these jokers in the Senate are not as well off as the people
they want to do favors for. I guess they feel they can stay in power by playing favorites. Butt kissing mo fos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yep. And they all have the option of those lucrative private sector jobs when they leave office. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. put it to pen and paper...
this clown is the 51st Repub Senator if the Pubs hit 49 and Lieberman jumps to make 50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ambiguous? ...... You're far too charitable, Bluebear.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Who could possibly argue against targeting Ben Nelson --
no one in Nebraska could actually be voting for this jerk?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC