|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:29 PM Original message |
The DADT lawsuit was filed by the Log Cabin Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmericanMan1958 (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sleep with a Snake.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. This year, Republicans have overturned Prop 8 and now DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Told the Stonewall Democrats to STFU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I intellectually understand that the administration has a responsibility to defend the law in court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Is that even true? I'm asking because I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. The CA thing is news because that almost never happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
44. They certainly don't have to defend it so vigorously or nastily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 06:20 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. They didn't call any witnesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 06:27 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Have you ever read the DOJ brief? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. we'll get bitten by a rat instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Another Obama victory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Huh? The administration is *defending* DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I think they were being sarcastic maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Ah, right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. And, State loses on a 4th & 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well, someone had to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I'm usually one of the few surviving Obama cheerleaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. The lawsuit began in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Is your point that they were originally suing a Republican administration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. "Republicans are suing a Democratic administration to obtain equal protection for homosexuals." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yes, they are currently suing a Democratic administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. No, the bench trial began under a Democratic administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. And the government presented no witnesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Who is "shit stirring"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. LCR didn't sue a Democratic administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Deleted message |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:30 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. "Do not draw negative attention to the fact that someone is new, has a low post count..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. LOL subtle! Well, my apologies, welcome to DU, glad you stumbled on the site & you studied the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. I'd accept your apology, if your intent was true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Because I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaughterOfBilitis (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I can assure you that I didn't sign up to be contrary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I am honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:32 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. No, it's really not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. We owe the Log Cabin Republicans a debt of gratitude for advancing this. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Unfortunately, yes. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Agreed. But hey, somebody has to lead on the issue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. My 7 years in the military tell me this won't change much any time soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I can't wait for the "survey" of military families to be published. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. "How do you feel about showering with a known sodomite in a state of extreme arousal?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Would you A) Call a chaplain? B).....yeah that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:02 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Here's a scan of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:07 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. "Would repealing DADT affect your family readiness?" - Good heavens. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. "I would avoid getting to know one of them", "I would try to get to know one of them" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
46. That is a seriously tacky mirror! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
45. Thanks for that bit of info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 09:41 AM Response to Reply #45 |
54. Oh, child! Oh, girl! Like you care! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. About you?? Hell no! About this issue? Definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. I find that I don't care who filed against who. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-09-10 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
42. I guess all those people who wondered how in the world gay people could join an "R" party/group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
47. I've said it more than once... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
48. The existance of the Log Cabin Republicans boggles my mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 12:33 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. It probably just sucks to be a politically active "conservative" homosexual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 06:24 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. A vocal cadre within the Republican party is homophobic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
53. Kudos to the Log Cabin Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-10-10 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
55. Good for them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC