Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Everything you needed to know about San Bruno-devastating PG&E (taxpayer bailouts; dereg lobbying)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 11:57 AM
Original message
Everything you needed to know about San Bruno-devastating PG&E (taxpayer bailouts; dereg lobbying)
PG&E's Prop 16 was defeated by California voters back in June, but this article has a lot of info on the various games PG&E has been playing for decades:


http://exiledonline.com/how-pge-plans-to-screw-the-golden-state-by-enshrining-its-corporate-energy-monopoly-in-the-california-constitution/

snip

For starters, PG&E was one of the prime backers of the catastrophic law that deregulated California’s energy sector, which led to rampant fraud, manipulation and speculation in the electricity market by energy-trading companies like Enron, causing artificial electricity shortages, massive black-outs, 20-fold increases in electricity rates and, ultimately, to PG&E’s own bankruptcy.

snip

Instead of letting the deregulated market do its magic and let a more competitive company step in, PG&E lobbied California’s pliable legislators for a 40% rate increase and two rounds of bailouts that came to a total of $16 billion, courtesy of PG&E customers. In fact, the utility’s 5 million ratepayers are still paying for the company’s mistakes through mandatory fees. By the time PG&E’s bankruptcy-related debts are paid off in 2012, ratepayers will each have dished out around $1,500 to keep it from collapsing.

But wait, there’s more. Not only does PG&E enjoy a government-sanctioned monopoly throughout most of Northern California, but, on top of all the bailouts, California legislators have guaranteed the company 11% profit margins. It’s the kind of risk-free free market that corporate dreams are made of, allowing PG&E to squeeze $1.22 billion in pure profit from its ratepayer-suckers in 2009. Best of all, PG&E didn’t have to divert any of that cash towards paying down its debts — that’s what the customers are there for, remember? To show its gratitude, PG&E constantly jacks up electricity rates, skimps on service and generally makes its customers pay the highest electricity rates in the state. According to the Fresno Bee , PG&E charges double the average electricity rates of most public utilities and one-third more than its private counterparts in Southern California.

snip

To escape PG&E clutches, municipalities up and down California have been eyeing a 2002 law known as “community choice aggregation,” or CAA, which allows California cities and counties to become energy wholesalers who purchase power on behalf of their residents. The formation of CCAs poses a direct threat to PG&E’s monopoly by giving ratepayers greater bargaining power and allowing local governments to buy power from any energy producer — independent wind and solar energy companies, for instance — while using PG&E just for its power lines. In effect, it allows Californians to tap into and directly benefit from their state’s energy deregulation. “CCAs hold the potential for a substantial improvement in the energy market and increased efficiency,” determined a 2005 study of community choice aggregation by the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley.

snip

To protect its racket, PG&E has been waging war on uppity municipalities trying to enter the electricity business. Ever since the CCA law came into effect in 2002, the utility has been racing up and down the state, squashing local ballot measures that would enact CCAs with scare tactics and expensive disinformation campaigns...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't PG&E the utility that
Erin Brockovich was involved in that huge lawsuit about them putting carciogens in the water???

Also, they had been warned over three weeks ago about the gas fumes that people were smelling and they did NOTHING>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2 Much Tribulation Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Erin Brockovich busted for poisoning the small town of Hinkley’s H2O with Chromium? YUP. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, Leopard's don't change their spots
It's like another BP disaster - corporate greed at its finest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They already had a body count
http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_15452319

After a dramatic legal battle against PG&E, a San Jose mother whose daughter was killed in a fiery crash with a utility company driver has accepted $5 million to resolve her wrongful death lawsuit.

Lisa Bernstein was so heartbroken by her tragic loss at the hands of a diabetic driver whom prosecutors said blacked out after not testing his blood sugar that she hauled the twisted carcass of her daughter Mary's truck last month up to PG&E headquarters in San Francisco....

When PG&E refused last month to support legislation to make companies more accountable for errant drivers, Bernstein insisted on going to trial even if it meant she was awarded only $1. One of her own lawyers turned purple at her refusal, she said, called her a lunatic and stomped out of the mandatory settlement conference....

"After Prop. 16, I thought they were incompetent idiots and I didn't want them near me," Bernstein said. "But I didn't want them to oppose me, either."


Indeed. :dunce: :cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But wait! There's more!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_large_explosion

It's not the first time a deadly explosion on a PG&E gas line has devastated a Northern California neighborhood.

On Christmas Eve 2008 an explosion killed a 72-year-old man in the Sacramento suburb of Rancho Cordova, destroyed one home and seriously damaged others.

The National Transportation Safety Board's final report said PG&E used a wrong pipe to repair the gas line two years before the explosion. Rancho Cordova residents had reported of a gas smell in the area before the blast.

In response to the NTSB's findings, the company said it had taken "extraordinary measures" to ensure a blast like that would never happen again.


And if you believe that, I've got a bridge I'd like to show you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. That's the one!
and the same one that spent my ratepaying money to run misleading ads last spring on their pet initiative.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. And here I was thinking those damn socialist regulations were causing California's uncompetitiveness
:sarcasm:

According to the Fresno Bee , PG&E charges double the average electricity rates of most public utilities and one-third more than its private counterparts in Southern California.

It is no accident that chipmaker Intel is in Santa Clara rather than, say, Sunnyvale or Palo Alto. Chip manufacturing sucks down huge quantities of juice -- and Santa Clara has the only public utility in the South Bay, Silicon Valley Power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. When I lived in Palo Alto in the eighties,
It had a public utility that it controlled. I cannot imagine that people there gave that up.

Sunnyvale doesn't though.

I imagine Intel is where it is in part because Santa Clara is way cheaper than Palo Alto, or at least used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not surprising. Add in a decaying infrastructure, and the recipe for disaster is complete.
How many disasters is it going to take before Americans wake up and realize this malignant neglect, which started with that asshole Reagan, is ruining this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m00nbeam Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. So glad California voters saw through it on Prop 16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Prop 16 actually passed outside PG&E's service area
Edited on Fri Sep-10-10 01:36 PM by KamaAina
within the area where people actually have to deal with them, it lost three to one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m00nbeam Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Very interesting
Glad it lost, at any rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't blame PG&E...
Edited on Fri Sep-10-10 03:16 PM by RufusTFirefly
A shark is a killing machine. It doesn't kill out of malice. Likewise, a corporation is a profit machine. That's just what it does. PG&E is simply being true to its amoral corporate imperative.

The only way to stop corporations from destroying this country for the sake of their own selfish profits is to greatly strengthen regulations that corporations must meet and step up the penalties for violating these regulations -- including the prospect of losing their corporate charter.

Unfortunately, as Chris Hedges points out, we are victims of "Inverted Totalitarianism," where corporations bring legislators to heel instead of the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Great sentence there -
Unfortunately, as Chris Hedges points out, we are victims of "Inverted Totalitarianism," where corporations bring legislators to heel instead of the other way around.

And that in very few word explains the death of our once great democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC