|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:33 PM Original message |
Is Arianna Huffington still a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Being a Republican is a lot like being an alcoholic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. I'll bet Obama's Sec. of State would disagree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Ouch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
180. If I remember correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu Sep-30-10 06:21 AM Response to Reply #37 |
232. As long as the money is rolling in. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
74. Stephanie Miller too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 08:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
58. Bad analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nazi like censorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
47. maybe you should start your own website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
181. and we wouldnt be at all familiar with a place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
116. Lame character assasination attempt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. There is more money to be made attacking those in power than attacking those out of power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 07:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
54. +1...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
82. Deleted message |
monmouth
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. She annoys me to no end and I rarely go to HuffPo anymore. Very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Many Republicans voted for Obama n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
strawberryfield
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
148. Those Republicans have forgotten why they did that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Mon Sep-27-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #148 |
230. My dad was a lifelong Pubbie... he switched parties and voted Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. She ran as an independent when she ran for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. What day of the week is it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. I've grown to really dislike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. Does this mean the trashing of all other lefty blogosphere sites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. shh, don't buck the pogrom. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Read Arianna's column |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I did, can you read this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. That doesn't disprove what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
183. How dare she write a book to make money! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 06:26 AM Response to Reply #183 |
198. So are you going to cyber-stalk me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. GOP obstruction.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Thanks for the talking point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Reality: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Facts is facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Excuses are excuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Sounds like you're rooting for the GOP nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 05:05 AM Response to Reply #42 |
49. Just laying out what most people see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 07:38 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Sorry but not letting you hijack this thread. Buh-bye! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
172. Agree -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
185. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kweli4Real
![]() |
Thu Sep-30-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
235. If you've sensed comtempt or being backhanded ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Its Allllllllllllll Joe Lieberman'sssss fault! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:13 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. No because the Dems didn't abuse the system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 08:32 AM Response to Reply #41 |
57. How would FDR or LBJ have dealt with Lieberman, Baucus, or Nelson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 09:16 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. But FDR and LBJ had much larger majorities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. But....but....but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:15 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. Nice quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps
![]() |
Thu Sep-30-10 07:04 AM Response to Reply #72 |
233. Then what is your "reality." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #233 |
237. So you think Hillary would have done better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
186. Pushing through an agenda when you have the majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #40 |
173. Exactly .... !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
184. Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #25 |
66. Translation: I don't like the answer you gave me so I'm going to pretend that it has nothing to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. Translation: I refuse to even acknowledge simple facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #73 |
128. You don't have any facts. You have an opinion you're looking for someone to bolster And you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:25 AM Response to Reply #128 |
134. I have plenty of facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 06:59 AM Response to Reply #66 |
216. Whoa Raineyb -- when did you get zapped? I will miss you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChimpersMcSmirkers
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
194. Shh...You'll give people that idea that Ariana might be using the left to further her own agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
43. thank you. I am SO FUCKING SICK of people who trash liberal web sites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
174. Notice also how many prominent Democrats are now on DLC/DU "enemies list" because they've criticized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #174 |
187. A few of his followers, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChimpersMcSmirkers
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #174 |
195. Jane Hamsher is a PUMA and should be vilified for that reason alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #195 |
203. You want Jane Hamsher "villified" for supporting Hillary Clinton ... ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
169. Totally agree with you. Between the attacks on Huffington Post & Firedoglake-DU is unrecognizable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #169 |
175. But never do I see a discussion of the ISSUE ... always the "pony" or the attack on messenger --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Wed Sep-29-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
231. Thanks for posting the facts!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. No, I think she changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
18. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. Sometime she acts like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
20. No the part of the Republican party she was in doesn't exist anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #20 |
94. And some of them are now calling themselves Dems, and dragging the party rightward! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #94 |
106. Not bashing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #106 |
122. In agreement with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #122 |
130. Thanks :-) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:02 AM Response to Reply #20 |
120. +10000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
21. She's an enemy of the people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. Do you still beat your spouse? Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
23. She helps make sure we keep our divisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Exactly! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
24. Damn, guys? It's when she found out her husband was bi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FirstTimeVoterAt37
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
27. The two themes of the new, improved HuffPo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
28. Arianna Huffington is whatever she needs to be to make a living. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. LOL- the woman is wealthy enough that she has no need to "make a living" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #38 |
188. It costs a lot to maintain that lifestyle ;) NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. Lets ask Hillary. She would know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
176. Hillary is also part of DLC leadership ....why would we vote for more pro-corporate decision making? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. She's a Gabor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. Let's see. Your argument is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. No the argument is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 01:46 AM Response to Reply #35 |
48. How can Huffington undermine a political movement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 07:41 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. The fact that she doesn't account for GOP obstuction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #51 |
177. What GOP obstruction? When GOP is in minority, they control Congress.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #177 |
189. Its odd how we do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #177 |
191. OK I guess you're just ignoring the record number of cloture votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #191 |
201. How many actual "filibusters" by the GOP have you seen . . . ??? Only cave-in's by Dems .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #201 |
205. Wow you are really ignorant as to how the system works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-18-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #205 |
213. CLOTURE is used to break a filibuster ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 06:57 AM Response to Reply #213 |
215. 118 times so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #215 |
219. There have been NO actual GOP filibusters .... only threats ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #219 |
223. By the definition you presented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Sep-20-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #223 |
225. A filibuster is by ONE person standing on the floor ... speaking... until he can no longer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-20-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #225 |
226. That's not the definition you presented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
70. Deleted message |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. I have and you are misrepresenting what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. You are misrepresenting your own post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. Please stop engaging in semantical minutia and logical fallicies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #85 |
93. Nice try. But shows limited imagination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #93 |
102. I never denied anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #102 |
108. First, learn what a strawman is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #108 |
112. As usual you resort to cheap namecalling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:01 AM Response to Reply #112 |
119. You call telling you that you have no facts name calling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #119 |
129. I have plenty of facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #129 |
139. Another word you have problems with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. Again you can't refute any of my facts so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #143 |
190. But your facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #190 |
192. Prove it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #192 |
196. prove your logical falacy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #196 |
197. I already have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #34 |
46. she doesn't advocate Republican policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 07:42 AM Response to Reply #46 |
52. But my point is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
71. Your point is crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. How eloquent of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. But as I said, if you go around accusing people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. How lame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #84 |
91. No. It just matches yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #91 |
103. Epic Fail!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #79 |
95. It's called False Flag, Jake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Come, come. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. I'm a ditz... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Whew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #79 |
178. ... actually, I'm accused of being a "T-bagger" --- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. You're sure spending a lot of time trashing Democrat Ariana Huffington. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Can you prove she's a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 02:36 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. I take her at her word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #86 |
90. So she is a Democrat who attacks other Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #90 |
92. Give it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #92 |
104. No I'm asking a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. Deleted message |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. More namecalling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:07 AM Response to Reply #114 |
124. You really need to know the meanings of the words you use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #124 |
135. No when you start replying to response I make to others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #135 |
138. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #135 |
140. Deleted message |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #140 |
144. Please you arguing with me over 3 sub-thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #144 |
150. Please. Learn how forums work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #150 |
153. So now you're blaming the software |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 10:29 PM Response to Reply #153 |
156. So now you're blaming DU for your paranoia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #156 |
160. It still doesn't explain your cyber-stalking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #160 |
164. It does explain that you don't know what cyber-stalking means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #164 |
166. You're the one who doesn't know what it means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #166 |
167. Ah. I'm flattered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #167 |
171. Actually it's the DU moderators that deleted your abusive posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #171 |
204. If you keep ducking . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 07:02 AM Response to Reply #135 |
217. That isn't what threadstalking was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 08:39 AM Response to Reply #217 |
218. Depends on the mod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 12:03 PM Response to Reply #78 |
96. Since Arianna is a registered Dem, does that make you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 07:00 PM Response to Reply #96 |
105. Do you have proof that she's a registered Dem? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. Do you have proof that she isn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. My argument is that she was a Republican for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:08 AM Response to Reply #113 |
125. Your statement is reasonable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #125 |
131. Very true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #113 |
126. Boy. Where to start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:24 AM Response to Reply #126 |
133. Again you indulge in strawman arguements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #133 |
141. Learn what strawman means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #141 |
145. I know what it means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #145 |
151. Not according to the way you are using it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. So you admit that can't refute any of the facts I presented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. So you admit that your facts are just your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:42 AM Response to Reply #157 |
161. No My facts are facts that you can't refute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #161 |
165. Deleted sub-thread |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:06 AM Response to Reply #34 |
123. It's a valid question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Fri Sep-10-10 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
36. She's a sleazy opportunist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:27 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. I agree that Huffington Post is waaay too gossip mag sleazy for my tastes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuntcat
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
227. for real, there's a lot of important stuff they could cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
45. No, of course not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #45 |
55. Or maybe she's fooled you into thinking she's a fine progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #55 |
67. Why did you bother to ask the question if all you're going to to is complain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #67 |
75. Because this is a discussion board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:47 AM Response to Reply #75 |
127. And yet with all the right winged media out there you make this lame ass post about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #127 |
136. So you resort to attacking me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 01:53 AM Response to Reply #136 |
158. Deleted message |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:50 AM Response to Reply #158 |
162. I have plenty of facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #162 |
206. Deleted message |
DrSteveB
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
53. Please be specific and tell us what Arianna lied about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 09:14 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. I never said she lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
56. $$$$$$$ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
59. It's all about the mighty dollar. $$$$$$$$$$ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
60. You do realize that without GOP crossover votes, Obama wouldn't have won? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 09:19 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Not trashing but questioning if she is really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. She is more on our side than on the right's side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. Sorry but they spent at least 30 minutes spewing misinformation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
65. Despite her Cambridge degree she's lacking in certain intellectual aspects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 04:14 AM Response to Reply #65 |
89. For some reason, the Greek accent is a hard one to "lose" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #65 |
101. My mom couldn't shed her accent (Spanish) either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 06:34 AM Response to Reply #101 |
117. I believe Ms. Huffington moved to the UK when she was 16 or so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greybnk48
![]() |
Sat Sep-11-10 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
69. She's definitely not a Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
87. The Huffington Post originally present itself as somewhat neutral, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 04:11 AM Response to Original message |
88. Ariana is a publicitican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
99. I sure like her better than her ex-husband, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE1947
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
107. She is a "CC" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #107 |
111. LOL- what a ridiculous thing to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:28 PM Response to Reply #107 |
115. Well said nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
118. You better believe it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
121. Saw her on ABC's "This Week" Sunday ... nothing but right wing talking points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yella_dawg
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
132. She "changed parties" soon after her divorce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:31 AM Response to Reply #132 |
137. She was divorced in 1997 but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
142. Damn all those "Professional Leftists," eh James? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 03:09 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. Interesting that you changed the subject from Huffington. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #146 |
152. Somebody had to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #152 |
155. So now you're reverting to personal attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Sep-14-10 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
147. This wouldn't have anything to do with "criticism" of Dems/Obama by any chance???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Wed Sep-15-10 07:27 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. Two decades??? I don't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 03:05 AM Response to Reply #149 |
159. Divorced in '97 from Michael Huffington. . . and around then "shifted BACK to the left" ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 08:54 AM Response to Reply #159 |
163. So the fact that in 2000 she was writing for the Washington Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #163 |
182. What you have are empty accusations... based on a need to attack Arianna because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #182 |
193. No I have facts which you can't seem to refute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #193 |
200. You also have an active imagination re people personally attacking you ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #200 |
207. Yet no one including you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Sep-18-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #207 |
212. When you present facts, we'll refute them ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 06:55 AM Response to Reply #212 |
214. OK here's a list of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #214 |
220. Deleted message |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 10:38 PM Response to Reply #220 |
222. That's specious logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
168. The new Godwin Law: Not sucking-up to corporate DLC policies = "Nazi-like" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 05:53 PM Response to Reply #168 |
170. So I guess you can't factually refute me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo
![]() |
Thu Sep-16-10 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
179. Since with is Arianna a republican? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
199. I will say this about huffington post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
202. She is a very bad writer. Bad writers find it easier to snark than to form new ideas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Fri Sep-17-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
208. Is Cenk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-18-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #208 |
209. Is Cenk what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sat Sep-18-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #209 |
210. Cenk calls himself a centrist former Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sat Sep-18-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #210 |
211. I don't know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #210 |
221. Given the way our politics were moved to the extreme right ... that would have made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Sep-19-10 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
224. I think she's been a registered independent since the rise of Ah-nold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-10 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
228. She hasn't donated to any candidates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera
![]() |
Wed Sep-22-10 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
229. NO She's Absolutely NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creon
![]() |
Thu Sep-30-10 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
234. she might be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu Sep-30-10 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
236. If there was still time to Rec this I would, just for all the entertaining sub-threads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-10 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
238. She rides whatever political wave she can catch. Like a fashion addict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-10 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
239. I would venture to guess that she is far more progressive than those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC