Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well now, lookie here! Dick Blumenthal lead over McMahon growing bigger!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 06:54 AM
Original message
Well now, lookie here! Dick Blumenthal lead over McMahon growing bigger!
Blumenthal Ups Lead in Race for Conn. Senate Seat

Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal increased his lead over Republican Linda McMahon by two points in a Rasmussen poll released Friday, scoring 53 percent to 44 percent.

This month, for the first time, Rasmussen included “leaners” in its results, which it defines as “those who initially indicate no preference for either of the candidates but answer a follow-up question and say they are leaning towards a particular candidate.” Rasmussen said at this point in the campaign, leaners are “the primary indicator of the race.”

Without the leaners, Blumenthal’s lead is 51-43 over McMahon, up from August’s 47-40 score, according to Rasmussen...

more at link:
http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2010/09/11/news/aa3_ctsenpoll0910091110.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FirstTimeVoterAt37 Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. There isn't a McMahon that isn't a criminal
Edited on Sat Sep-11-10 07:44 AM by FirstTimeVoterAt37
Seriously, I'm not trying to be hyperbolic here. This is one horrific bunch of people, and dear LORD they must not be allowed to have a say in public policy, however feeble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Her ads don't address issues, tho.
It's just her best friend, another woman "of a certain age", that tells us that "Linda loves to laugh." That's as far as I get before I hit the mute button on my remote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't you get it? She is one of us. A regular person who..
happens to have 50 million to spend on an ego rub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstTimeVoterAt37 Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Confession: I'm a "smark"
Edited on Sat Sep-11-10 08:26 AM by FirstTimeVoterAt37
Lousy term for someone who likes wrestling as an exhibition event, admires the athletes, and is COMPLETELY aware that it's scripted.

No, I'm not even horrified at the treatment of women. One look at how they treat their men more or less kills that argument. All their employees are equally worthless.

But as a... (ugh) "smark", I like to follow the business just like football fans follow their selected choice of entertainment.

Picture Linda McMahon happily forcing boob-jobs on the women (as in, "get your tits exploded WITH YOUR OWN MONEY or you never work in this business again"), steroids on the men (again, blackballing for non-compliance in shooting your ass full of horse steroids is par for the course), humiliating them on a regular basis, eagerly embracing nepotism, and reaping the rewards of a complete disregard for the workers that make her money for her. Your CEO's at work.

Then there's Vince, who is without a doubt the most unapologetic monopolist there is. Lots of companies buy out other companies, but how many brag for YEARS on how they put the other guys out of business and cost hundreds of employees their jobs? Seriously, I don't mean "This was a good business decision", I mean "Ha ha, I fucked those guys over good for competing with me". And no, that wasn't from a wrestling sketch, that was a business magazine article (which I am trying to find and will link to).

Their kids like to pretend they're just actors, but for anyone who pays the slightest bit of attention it's painfully obvious they're the wrestling equivalent of Rupert Murdoch's brat.

Seriously. If you only care about fair treatment of workers but think wrestlers deserve to die horribly after having their bodies abused to invalidity, still, NO McMahon can be allowed public office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. shhh. that doesn't follow the media word that democrats will get trounced
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstTimeVoterAt37 Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Crud, you're right, I didn't trash the dems in that post
Sorry about that. :)

MAJOR :sarcasm: which I apologize for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC