Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9 years out, and Osama still not formally charged.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 08:55 AM
Original message
9 years out, and Osama still not formally charged.
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

from 2006 (the last time anyone cared to notice)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700687.html

Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is a longtime and prominent member of the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" list, which notes his role as the suspected mastermind of the deadly U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa on Aug. 7, 1998.

But another more infamous date -- Sept. 11, 2001 -- is nowhere to be found on the same FBI notice.

The curious omission underscores the Justice Department's decision, so far, to not seek formal criminal charges against bin Laden for approving al-Qaeda's most notorious and successful terrorist attack. The notice says bin Laden is "a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world" but does not provide details.

(end snip)

I would think that after 9 years, we could see a formal charge. Maybe the FBI is waiting for the ten year anniversary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Got to have some evidence. THERE IS NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There Is Probably More Evidence On BushCo Than Bin Ladin.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetradesucks Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Do you really think that if they wanted to charge Osama,
that they would wait until they gathered actual credible evidence? They could manufacture it on the spot if that fit their needs.

There is plenty of evidence that ties him to the attack. They have not charged him for lack of evidence, but for other, most likely political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's no intention of putting him on trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. But I saw an article on CNN
where they are now blaming Obama for not catching him already. No mention of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. bu$h was gonna "smoke 'im out" in September 2001
but by March 2002 it was, Osama bin Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nor Bushler

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. How do you charge a corpse?
Osama is long dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Exactly.
Benazir Bhutto said as much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. and he won't ever be charged!
He's dead! But if he had anything at all to do with 9/11, it was at the behest of some powerful American traitors. IMHO of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. He's dead
What's the point in charging him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama prefers a military solution.
Bin Laden will never be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. can't indict without any evidence anyway, right! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think he is willing to take bin Laden at his word. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. when he specifically denied having anything to do with it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. He said on tape it was his deal. If he is not already a bird turd
he will live the rest of his life knowing if he is found he will be killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. He specifically admitted he was behind 911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Notice the date? 10/29/04. Right before the election. The BFEE was making "Osama tapes"
faster than they could keep the actors hired (remember "fat" Osama).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Now all you have to prove is that it was in fact a fake.
looking forward to your evidence.

By the way, research all different VCR formats throughout the world and the "fat Osama" will make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Don't believe your lying eyes. Believe Dick Cheney!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Unlike you, I like to do my own thinking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. actually, I remember right after 9/11 he was filmed
and stated that he had nothing to do with it, but was glad it happened. Anyone else remember him stating that after 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Absolutely.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks

September 17, 2001 Posted: 11:21 AM EDT (1521 GMT)


DOHA, Qatar (CNN) -- Islamic militant leader Osama bin Laden, the man the United States considers the prime suspect in last week's terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, denied any role Sunday in the actions believed to have killed thousands.

In a statement issued to the Arabic satellite channel Al Jazeera, based in Qatar, bin Laden said, "The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons," bin Laden's statement said.

"I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations," bin Laden said.

Asked Sunday if he believed bin Laden's denial, President Bush said, "No question he is the prime suspect. No question about that."

-edit-

Immediately after the attacks that demolished the World Trade Center's landmark twin towers and seriously damaged the Pentagon, officials of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban said they doubted bin Laden could have been involved in carrying out the actions.

-edit-

*********************
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Apparently they admit they don't have enough evidence against him
for a formal charge.

But for war, they don't need that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. yep, the neo cons got their "Pearl Harbor"
just what they needed to "catapult" their agenda. Well, someone must have been for that agenda because all anyone had to do at the time is google "PNAC" and find exactly what was on the agenda for the ME. Now, to me, someone who actually cared about the people in the ME, wouldn't have wanted to give these neo cons an excuse. Oh wait, 11 out of the 15 hijackers were from SA, and it appears SA is doing just fine. Got rid of that pesky US base, US attacked Iraq (got rid of that pesky Saddam), and increased recruitment for AQ to spread that SA brand of Wahabism. And look, even got a so-called american attorney, Baker, to represent them against some of the 9/11 families.

It looks like one country in the ME is doing just fine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC