Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Van Hollen (D-MD): "Hey, let’s just do one year for the top 2 percent"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:47 PM
Original message
Chris Van Hollen (D-MD): "Hey, let’s just do one year for the top 2 percent"


Van Hollen Would Consider Tax Cuts for Wealthy for Another Year
By Laura Litvan -

U.S. House Democrat Chris Van Hollen said he would consider extending Bush-era tax cuts for wealthier Americans for a year if Republicans would agree to make the reductions permanent for “middle class” taxpayers.

Republicans, including House Minority Leader John Boehner, have insisted that the tax cuts should be extended for all Americans for two years. Taxes are expected to dominate the agenda when Congress returns next week.

“If they were to come back and say, ‘hey, let’s just do one year for the top 2 percent, and permanent for the middle class,’ that would be something that obviously people would have to think about,” Van Hollen said in an interview on “Political Capital with Al Hunt” airing this weekend on Bloomberg Television.

He said he was speaking “individually” and not on behalf of Democratic leaders.

Van Hollen of Maryland, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, predicted his party “will hold onto a majority in the House” even in the face of polling that shows Republicans are poised to retake control.

“I think a lot of the doom and gloom you hear in the national media is not playing out in each of these local districts,” Van Hollen said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-10/van-hollen-would-consider-one-year-extension-of-bush-tax-cuts-for-wealthy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. The man is a twit. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's what the Republicans would like a tax increase
in the Presidential an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Keep the 33% bracket for those making over $250,000
Put a 43% bracket for those making over $500,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. idiota n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. "One year" . . . "weeellllll . . . changed my mind. Why not make it .. .ssay . ..TWO years?"
"How about FIVE?"

"Twist my arm, GIVE' EM TEN, and a round of handjobs?"

"DONE!"

Jump, little doggie, JUMP!! "Pant, Pant!!! How High, my master?"

With "Dems" like these, who needs enemas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. They'll never go away if you fall into that trap
Unfortuantely, there is always a next election. It's always either an election year or a year before an election year.

No time for spell check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Democrats are the slaves of the republicans and the rich
He just said it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why, Chris, why?
They just had 10 years and now they want more??? Ummmm, I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Let's not, and say we did.
You know, like the Republicans on most issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. That's just what the GOP wants, another year to use this as an election issue
As fiscally irresponsible as the GOP are, one of the reason they didn't make the tax cuts permanent was so they could make it an issue years later to get votes without actually lowering taxes. They also made them not permanent just to get better CBO numbers farther down the line that used the Clinton tax rates after the Bush tax cuts expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. So the Repubs can run against your huge deficits?
Which they will do... because you are stupid. Good job, fella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oops. Sounds like this man is too comfortable to understand
that in order to extend that entitlement to the top two percenters, many poor people will have to sacrifice at a time when they have already been doing so for the last ten years. Time to share the burden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bernynhel Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Additonal bending over details may be on the table.
Will consider two years contingent upon reach around agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does he think publically rebuking the president
is a smart political strategy? So coming up on the elections you want to fold on the biggest winning issue democrats have? The vast majority want these cuts ended, democrats are on the right side of this issue, but Van Hollen wants to literally give up on it by agreeing with republicans. This guy is incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not just no, Hell NO!!!
What is this DINO smoking?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cenk nailed his DINO ass for exactly what it is on the whole
Social Security Commission thing a few weeks back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. With dick weed's like him who needs Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Let's not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. This fucker needs to be rode out of town on a rail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. ...
&*^%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. Because the rich are in such desperate need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. These are the words of a wealthy man.
Edited on Sun Sep-12-10 08:14 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC