|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:51 AM Original message |
On Progressive “Red-Baiting” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. K&R, thanks for posting.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks for recommending! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. thankfully, tho, it's okay to promote Charlie Crist for office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I'm not sure your point, but I don't think anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Don't even get me started on that bit of hypocrisy. It frosts the hell out of me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Deleted message |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Making my point through negative exemplar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I like DU. I'm grateful to DU for the services it offers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I'm with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I like blue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. extremes from either side meet at some point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. this clarifies it for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
33. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. k & r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Hey is your picture... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. He's a radical asshole, that's for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. I wouldn't be surprised if he already has... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Why thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. hey maybe you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. The republicans weren't red until the 2000 election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Army drab maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredStembottom
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
9. Thick, murky article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Read these lines from the last paragraph, pretty clear I think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredStembottom
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
46. Read that before..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
13. How about Truther? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:32 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
14. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
17. A most timely discussion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. that all should be having... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. were not all in the same boat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. yeah about 1% are in the flagship...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. I disagree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 05:32 AM Response to Reply #40 |
48. That's your right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #48 |
83. The 1% has many associations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
21. bumping... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
34. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Panaconda
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
35. Hey that was really interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Wow and thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
37. K&R Well worth the read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
41. So, now nonviolence is redbaiting? What stupid bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. So you're equating 'street protests' and 'marches' to 'violent resistance' to the US govt?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. The author equated "wholesale dismissal of armed struggle" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. 'armed struggle' isn't always against 'government' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Sun Sep-12-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. The author thinks that opposing violence is red-baiting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 06:35 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. That is not what the author said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Panaconda
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 06:52 AM Response to Reply #43 |
53. Let's use two examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. If these academics were in the Warsaw Ghetto or Iraq, maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:07 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Simply unacceptable - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:16 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. The solution is via the political process, not via murder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. You ignored most of my reply - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:33 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. They do not have the right to pick up a gun and shoot cops or bank employees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. Again, I didn't say they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Peaceful marches and strikes and civil disobedience are perfectly acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. She stated a lot of things - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. It is not redbaiting to dismiss armed struggle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. I don't see it that way - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:08 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. It should be shut down. It would be hypocritical for us to object to this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. So you are saying leftist voices should be silenced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. No, but violence and those who endorse it must be repudiated. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. OK, but that has nothing to do with this OP. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
81. I believe in self defense........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
47. This is hillarious - so many of the positions she attacks are so obviously sensible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 05:44 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Do you realize that you have proven the authors main point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:19 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Sorry, but the line gets drawn on politically inspired murder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #58 |
73. You are the only one debating that - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. No, condemning violence is not the same as squashing leftwing speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. No one said it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 06:33 AM Response to Reply #47 |
50. "Sensible" liberals - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Rounding up people based on ideology is not the same as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. I didn't say it was - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. The Palmer raids were an obvious abuse of power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:01 AM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Sure, after the damage was done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #69 |
80. Thanks for the link... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
52. Gatekeepers.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:13 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. But now that folks are being kicked out of the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
62. This reminds me of some of the "radical" posturing speech of the early 1970's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryf
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 07:09 PM Response to Reply #62 |
79. but do you not also see a resurgence of red baiting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
71. kr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Sep-13-10 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
82. What about dismissing people as "corporate shills" or "DLCers" or "neoliberals" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC