|
Stupid buttons. Anyway, I don't want our side to have "power" for the sake of power, of course, but I'd like to see the people who aren't (1) religious fanatics, and (2) greedy and unscrupulous actually have a chance to govern without constant obstruction and electioneering.
The one thing this country lacks most sorely is generosity--of wealth, of spirit, of everything. We are stingy with our dollars, stingy with our praise, and many of us would literally rather die than to see someone we dislike get a government benefit of any kind--whether in the form of a respected right, a civil right, or some kind of financial assistance.
When the right-wing whines about losing their "rights", what they MEAN is that they've lost the right to control other peoples' lives and behaviors. They hate welfare because it allows poor (and often black) women to raise children OUTSIDE of the "traditional" cultural taboos and norms that used to regulate behavior. When women have a guaranteed source of basic income, they don't have to be married and submit to a husband in order to survive. They don't have to attend church in order to build community ties for survival--and thus, they can live outside of the paternalistic influence of the church if they choose.
When women have the secular right to get an abortion, their sexuality is seen by the right-wing as uncontrolled-by-the-church (a.k.a., MEN), and therefore dangerous. When gay people and transgendered people have the right to get married, to NOT be fired for who they are, and to basically live OUTSIDE of the traditional "religious" rules, then religion loses power--and the right-wing HATES that.
And most of all--charity is no longer dependent upon "good behavior". The jerks on the right can no longer choose NOT to help someone that they consider "unworthy". Everybody gets help, regardless of their "worthiness", and traditional-values-freaks just HATE that. When they say, "I like charity. I just don't want the government FORCING it on me!", what they really mean is "I want to decide who's worthy of my charity dollars, because there are SOME people that I'd rather not help, thanks much." They want the right to deny help to undesirables. They want the right to deny social acceptance to groups of people that they personally dislike.
Really, all of our biggest social "wedge issue" conflicts have their roots in sexism, racism, and homophobia. We're not fighting about whether or not abortion and gay marriage are "morally wrong". We're not disagreeing on whether welfare is a "hand up" or a "handout". What we're REALLY disagreeing on are the fundamentals of society--the very framework of our civilization. They want the old framework where SOME people are "better" than others, and therefore have more power. We want a new framework in which everybody is EQUAL, and everybody shares power.
So what I'd like to see are more efforts in pursuit of the latter--of constructing a new social framework that's built upon the basic premise that all people ARE equal, and that power should be shared amongst us all, not consolidated in people who have more wealth/the "stronger" gender/better morals/the "right" religion/etc. The amount of power you wield in a society should not be based on how rich you are, or how well you conform to the arbitrary moral and social norms of the ignorant majority.
|