Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dylan Ratigan Shameful UFO Interviews

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:05 PM
Original message
Dylan Ratigan Shameful UFO Interviews
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 08:04 PM by Drix
I saw Dylan Ratigan do two interviews recently, one with Michio Kaku, and the other with Leslie Kane regarding Kane's latest book. The subject is UFO's. And while I personally believe in UFO's that's really not the point of this post. Ratigan gave these two serious professionals the most disgusting display of condescension and ridicule outside of a comedy show and Fox News I've ever seen. It's obvious that these two people take their work seriously and Ratigan treated like they were mentally challenged clowns who should be mocked. Whether you believe in UFO's or not if you are going to invite scientists and journalists on your program you should treat them with a modicum of respect. If you don't disagree with them, get your facts in order and expose them for the ignorant, gullible, hucksters they are. I would love to see that. But that's not what he did. He got all cutesy and just ridiculed and mocked them with stupid questions and condescending comments.If you don't have any respect for their work why have them on in the first place? If you think they are wrong and need to be exposed get your facts in order and expose them. But he didn't do that. He shed no light on the subject and just acted an ass. I've seen Tweety take down ignorant Tea Baggers, KO interview Alvin Greene, and Rachel interview Rand Paul. In all those cases in was very obvious that the interviewer did not agree with the subject but they informed their viewers and treated the people appearing on their programs with respect.

There are lots of people who believe wild and crazy things, from burning bushes talking to rising from the dead. Ratigan would never take that tone with a priest or rabbi. Why is it that people with acknowledge that UFO's might exists, no matter how serious and thoughtful they might be get treated like deranged cultists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't see this interview, but if you are interested in UFOs...
Buzz Aldrin has a great website/app with lots of interviews with other astronauts who admit to seeing them on space missions, lots of tape (certainly some could be faked)and other great stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I'm fairly up on most popular UFO stories....
And this is what pisses me off. Where is the real and credible journalism? If there are a bunch of hucksters running around making a bunch of wild assed claims and taking suckers money isn't that a job for the news media to investigate? If you think the subject matter is important enough to appear on your program don't you have a responsibility to keep your viewers informed about the actual facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I generally find Radigan unpleasant to watch. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ratigan probably believes in an invsible man in the sky
Who made the world in seven days and knows everything about all of us. He has no business ridiculing anybody for their belief in strange creatures from space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. My point is.....
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 07:24 PM by Drix
I really don't care if he believes or not. But if he doesn't believe, be a journalist, do your homework, and humiliate them with cold hard facts. Not with your lame ass attempts at being cute. It's a news program? Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have nothing against UFO
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 07:19 PM by rocktivity


But I agree that it's shameful that it's inappropriate given what else is going on in the news.

:headbang:
rocktivity

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. ya, but don't get me started on ELO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AC_Mem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good Post
I think that people are just afraid of the unknown, and in Ratigan's case, that fear shows itself as ignorance.

Personally, I think it is a huge ego that believes that we are the only living beings in the Universe and beyond.

Peace, Annette
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Believe in UFOs" has to be the most overused misguided statement ever
"Do you believe in unidentified things? Yes??? OMG you're an idiot!!!"

And yet, that's how the discussion about UFOs typically goes.

I didn't see this interview but I would venture to guess that both Kaku and Kean don't have hard conclusions about what, exactly, all UFOs are. There are so many varied explanations depending on what the circumstances of the sighting are. But the simple fact is that the U stands for (ta dah!) UNIDENTIFIED!

That's like saying "I don't believe in unidentified living species." Which of course means that one believes that every living organism has been identified.

I can't stand how stupid people are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think you're missing the point.
My issue isn't whether UFO's exist or not. It's about a journalist responsibly reporting the subjects that he/she covers. Mocking your guests with condescending questions and cutesy comments is not journalism.

Also the "U" in UFO is a canard. Everybody knows we're talking about alien spacecraft when talking about UFO's. People mistaking birds and balloons is not the issue. It's about licensed professional civilian and military pilots, sworn law enforcement and military personnel making extraordinary claims. I'd like to see their stories investigated. Not mocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, I didn't miss the point, I just responded to another one
I totally got the point and agree, 100%, so didn't feel the need to state that.

And I disagree about the "U" meaning "Alien" because it does not! That's just bullshit. These craft are truly UNidentified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I understand your point but most people are refferring to ....
other worldly intelligently controlled craft be it time machines, inter-dimensional craft, or plus light speed space craft. If it's light reflecting off water nobody cares. But the reports are these UFO's behave as other worldly intelligently controlled craft. That's what is generating the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. "two serious profesional." "UFOs."
"serious."

"UFOs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Your condescension is duly noted
and quickly dismissed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm sure you'd know about being quickly dismissed.
If a person's going to believe in flying saucers, maybe they should expect this sort of treatment.

It ain't my problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yes.
When licensed commercial and military pilots start making wild claims they should be investigated. If pilots reported seeing mermaids or bigfoot in the cockpit they would be immediately relived of duty. Why do pilots who report UFO's get a pass if it is as crazy as you would have us believe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Argument from authority.
I a surgeon claimed a demon flew out when he opened up a patient, I would not believe him just because he was a surgeon.

Also, I'd be in favor of revoking his license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Argument from absurdity
Pilots are trained to observe things that fly in their airspace, I Know, that's almost ridiculous to consider.

Authority has NOTHING to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Your "excellent point" is a logical fallacy.
Not that I don't expect one after another from the UFO crowd.

"Pilots are trained to observe things that fly in their airspace, I Know, that's almost ridiculous to consider.

Authority has NOTHING to do with it."

That's an argument from authority. Pilots should be believed because they are authorities on observing things that fly in their airspace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Um, no. If a cop reported seeing a UFO, that's argument from authority
Cops aren't trained to observe flying craft.

FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. That's an incorrect use of the term "authority" in this context.
You know, if you ever get internet access some day, maybe you should look it up.

Fail fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Fail fail fail
Hah hah, I said it 3 times! You lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Doesn't matter how many times you say it.
Anybody who knows what "argument from authority" means, or can be bothered to look it up, knows that I win and you fail.

Not that reasonable person couldn't see that coming a mile away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. respect for others opinions and beliefs are sadly missing these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Opinions and beliefs are one thing.
Making up shit about flying saucers kidnapping you and probing your anus is a little different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
49. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. You're not getting it.........
If a surgeon is seeing demons fly out of patients the situation needs to be investigated. It doesn't matter whether you believe in demons or not. You still need to have a talk with him and the other people in the room when it happened and file a report. Not claim that you don't believe demons and Dr. Crazy make any claims he wants, it's really of no concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. You're not getting it.
If a surgeon sees demons flying out of a patient, he is a liar and a quack.

And the only investigation needed is the one to strip him of his license.

And maybe how he got the license in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. You still need an investigation.
It's way things work. Even witches got a trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. You do no need to a trial about whether or not demons existed.
Witches got burned, Drix, because a bunch of stupid liars and frauds made up a bunch of shit about witches, and other people, suckers, believed their stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. It's still not the point.....
I know you really want to make this discussion about anally probed hillbillies and how funny they are. That's not the discussion. It's about commercial and military pilots making extraordinary claims. If these pilots are crazy they need to be relieved of duty and given the medical attention they deserve. Not mocked and returned to duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Excellent point, and goes to the heart of Kean's thesis
And of course, most pilots *do not* report what they see, just for that very reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. yes, two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I will concede that there are indeed two of them.
That's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Belief in UFO's, alien abduction and the like is akin to belief in the Easter Bunny.
Edited on Mon Sep-13-10 08:11 PM by GoneOffShore
Basic silliness, worthy more of pointing and laughing than condescension.

However, good for Ratigan for shooting down woo merchants.

And you may be entitled to your opinion - but it's wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. No kidding!
And that so-called theory about the earth being round, that's another one.

How sad to live in such a small, confined universe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Oh my, you really skewered me with that one.
Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. so you honestly believe that in all the many galaxies out there, there is no other intelligent life?
If you hold that belief, it doesn't say much for your ability to think critically and in an analytical manner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. You're moving the goalposts.
Your moving goal posts doesn't say much for your ability to think critically or argue honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Thank Pron.
You got there before I was able to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. There's another logical fallacy.
A non sequitur.

Just because the earth is round, it does not mean that any crazy shit you want to be true is therefore true.

"How sad to live in such a small, confined universe."

The universe that I live is quite large, and filled with enough wonders, real actual wonders not made up ones, for anybody with a clear mind to see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Again, UFO's is not the point.
It's about journalism. Mocking is not reporting. And sorry I cannot share your opinion that commercial and military pilots reporting UFO's is "silliness". There is a reason that pilots are licensed and military and law enforcement are sworn. It's because we let them fly planes and carry loaded guns. If you don't believe in UFO's why aren't you outraged that they are allowed to continue duty? Would you let a cop carry a gun if you believe he hallucinates on duty? Would you want your pilot having delusions in the cockpit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. "Mocking is not reporting."
If journalistic integrity is your real issue...

then no, mocking is not reporting. And UFO stories are not real journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. You are still not getting it.
The issue isn't UFO's. It's commercial and military pilots reporting them. If these guys are crazy why aren't they immediately relieved of duty? You can't have it both ways. If they are crazy they should be decommissioned. If they are not crazy just what is going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I'm getting everything you're saying. It's just that you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drix Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. No you ae not getting it.
You want to have it both ways. You want to declare people delusional yet let them retain positions of responsibility without investigation. That doesn't make any sense what so ever. I don't know if you know the kill power of a military jet, let alone the expense. Letting crazy people behind the stick who weave wild stories and see things is a story to be investigated. Not mocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. Had no idea he was into woowoo...
but with the way he flip-flops around on everything else it's not the surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Kaku? Oh god yes.
He's been serving up that shit on a shingle for years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red red red Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. Perfect description...
Condescension and ridicule - thats why I do not watch him anymore - x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC