Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The plot to steal our future", the drive by America's ruling elite to slash Social Security.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
another saigon Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:52 PM
Original message
"The plot to steal our future", the drive by America's ruling elite to slash Social Security.
http://socialistworker.org/print/2010/09/13/plot-to-steal-our-future



September 13, 2010

CLOSED-DOOR meetings in Washington, attended by a carefully chosen collection of America's corporate and political elite. The crusade of a megalomaniac billionaire, and the un-scrutinized activities of his supposedly philanthropic foundation. Political agendas and records obscured by a manipulated media. The fates and futures of hundreds of millions of people on the line.

Sounds like the ingredients of a cheesy thriller, right?

Think again. This is exactly what's happening in Washington today with the campaign to wreck the Social Security system for current and future retirees.

The long-held obsession of some U.S. political and corporate leaders to make deep cuts in Social Security and impose other measures aimed at cutting working-class living standards is closer to reality than it's ever been, thanks to a Democratic president and a Congress controlled by the so-called "party of working people." <1>

The vehicle for this conspiracy to carry out measures that would cause an uproar if they were exposed to the light of day is the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, established by President Barack Obama by executive order after an attempt by two senators to create a congressional commission failed.

Obama promised as a candidate that he would back such a body--to make the "hard decisions" about government spending and taxes that politicians avoid. Supposedly, every proposal is "on the table" in the commission's deliberations about how to tackle the federal budget deficit and the financial future of government programs like Social Security.

But no one expects the commission to recommend, for example, significant reductions in Pentagon spending as a way to balance the budget. To make sure it didn't, Obama appointed David Cote as the one commission member who's closely associated with the issue of defense spending--that is, with increasing defense spending, especially to the company he runs, Honeywell, one of the Pentagon's biggest contractors.

On the other hand, the commission is stacked with advocates of cutting Social Security benefits--the kind of proposal that's very popular among the leaders of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, but that gets derailed when legislation comes before Congress and lawmakers start feeling popular pressure.

So the work of slashing a program that tens of millions of Americans depend on when they become too old to keep working has been delegated to the unelected commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. democrats' strongest issue prostituted by the current administration unless something changes soon n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Millions of American
voters (myself included) will forever hold President Obama responsible for any cuts or damage to social security. He has to know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. The last remaining leg of FDR's New Deal....
They HATE FDR and all he stood for. If they can kill Social Security... they will have wiped out the last traces of social safety nets.

After SS they will kill the G.I. Bill, ADA and the Civil Rights Bill... the sweep will be complete.

We are living in Germany... September 1932.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hitler increased social programs spending
It was in response to an austerity plan that he managed to get enough votes to engineer his takeover.

The Nazi's economic policies were more piecemeal and opportunistic than coming from a central plan, but their original demands included "the abolition of all incomes unearned by work," "the ruthless confiscation of all war profits," "the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations," "profit-sharing in large enterprises," "extensive development of insurance for old-age," and "land reform suitable to our national requirements". Although Hitler was probably being more honest when he said "The basic feature of our economic theory is that we have no theory at all."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama chose to do this to workers.
What ever the consequences he owns them 100%.


This secret, anti democratic, anti worker cat food commission has no legitimacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
another saigon Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. yes indeed he did
the defense of this scurrilous, greedy, elitist cat food commission, especially obama's keeping simpson, is abhorrent.
God, please wake me from this nightmare.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. No one, for example, expects the Commission to recommend restoring the tax rates to pre-Reagan days,
I would bet a huge bundle. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Millionaires and billionaires will only do what is best for their class.
If (a big if) that happens to coincide with an unintended benefit to workers then hooray. Otherwise they will steal you blind every time.

FDR was an aberration. We are way past one rich man in political power changing things in fundamental ways for workers. The political system is too corrupt. Any change will have to come from outside and it will be attacked violently by the elite in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. It sounds like a work of fiction, because that is exactly what this article is
the commission has no power, a point ignored by the author of this tripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes that up or down vote in the house of reps and senate
ought to be pretty interesting come dec.

Secret meetings, secret agendas, no representation from the working class allowed and an up or down vote with no discussion allowed.

You have to be pretty f*cking naive, to put it nicely, to think anything that comes out of the CAT FOOD COMMISSION is in the best interest of the majority of workers who earn 50,000 or less in this country.

But Obama apparently thought Pete Peterson, the billionaire anti social security RW asshole, had a pretty good idea that needed to be put into action, in secret of course. Wouldn't want the lesser working class folks to bother their pretty little minds with the nasty details only the elite can fully understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Old people will have to eat them for lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. k and r
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. And yet everyone laughed at Gore's lock box...
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Riot. We'll riot. And we'll riot in well to do burgs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC