Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-Onanism Teabaggin' Palin Pal Christine O'Donnell: Questions about my finances insult voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:48 AM
Original message
Anti-Onanism Teabaggin' Palin Pal Christine O'Donnell: Questions about my finances insult voters
Tea Party candidate: Questions about my personal, public finances insult voters

By Ron Brynaert
Tuesday, September 14th, 2010 -- 11:58 am

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/tea-party-candidate-attacks-finances-insult-voters/



Claims she made more than she reported to IRS last year but it's no one's business

She may not be a multi-millionaire, and she may have earned more than the paltry $5,800 she reported to the IRS last year, but Christine O'Donnell is no dummy. Taking lessons from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin -- whose endorsement made her a contender to begin with -- a conservative office-seeker is employing the "attack the messenger" defense to combat concerns about her private and public financing.

"A Tea Party-backed candidate in today's Delaware Republican primary for Senate said today that ads attacking her personal financial history are an insult to voters, and said recent polling showing her running strong against the candidate backed by GOP leaders suggests voters are 'fighting back,' David S. Morgan reports for Political Hotsheet at CBS News.

Huliq News notes, "After Delaware GOP Congressional candidate Christine O'Donnell was accused of not paying college debts and illegal campaign fundraising, she retorted on CBS's 'The Early Show,' with 'I'm an average hard-working American. I'm not a multi-millionaire like my opponent.'"

The Political Hotsheet article adds that "there's been increased scrutiny of O'Donnell's personal financial history, which her opponents say precludes her from effectively overseeing public finances, and complaints about alleged illegal campaign fundraising."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. If she pays her taxes or not is our business...
the repubs are the ones making a stink about Rangel's taxes now...so if she evaded paying her fair share it's important...


And if she doesn't pay her bills ...she's not responsible and shouldn't be hired (elected) as a senator...She would likely vote against the bill making credit checks for job applicants illegal, since that is the repub stance...so why shouldn't her credit history make a difference in the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's like asking Bernie Madoff to guard your retirement portfolio.
Cornholio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tax chiseler, campaign cheat
Sounds like a perfect fit for the Republicans. Can't see why that would insult the voters at all. Hell, we expect Republicans to lie, steal and cheat. We'll see if these items, non-issues in the Republican primary, gain any traction during the general election campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC