Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid is moving the Defense bill with DADT language

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:26 PM
Original message
Harry Reid is moving the Defense bill with DADT language
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 04:28 PM by cal04
Posted by Joe Sudbay
http://gay.americablog.com/2010/09/majority-leader-harry-reid-is-moving.html

This afternoon, I went to the Capitol to hear the Majority Leader and Minority Leader address the media about what's ahead in the Senate over the next couple weeks. Reid made it clear that he is moving ahead on the Defense bill, which includes the DADT language. He said DADT is a critical piece of that legislation. He expects the GOP to try to block the bill -- and he even told McConnell that the GOPers could have a separate vote to try to take the DADT language out of the Defense bill. Reid also said he wanted to add the DREAM Act to the Defense bill.

Reid also said:
I think we should choose common sense over discrimination. We're going to match our policies with our principles and finally say that iin our country, everyone who steps up to serve our country should be welcome.

Reid will file a cloture motion this week, setting a up vote to end the McCain-led filibuster. Reid was asked by by Kerry Eleveld if he has the votes to proceed on Defense bill. He answered,"we'll sure find out."

During his remarks, McConnell kept saying that the Defense authorization bill was "controversial." McConnell did say that DADT is one reason that the Defense Authorization is "controversial" in response to a question from the Washington Blade's Chris Johnson.

During his remarks, McConnell kept saying that the Defense authorization bill was "controversial." McConnell did say that DADT is one reason that the Defense Authorization is "controversial" in response to a question from the Washington Blade's Chris Johnson.

So, game on. A vote is coming. Call your Senators: 202-224-3121. You know the homophobes are in overdrive.


video at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Smart Maneuvering By Reid, Kudos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. If we lose the House, the legislation permits Prez and DOD to jointly lift the ban if they so choose
Marvelous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can they end the filibuster? The republicans have 41 votes to stop anything and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We can't alone, but Snowe/Collins are in favor of the DADT language in the bill.
So they might vote for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is one issue where the republicans will stick together. It is party orthodoxy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC