Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a dumb question.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:16 PM
Original message
I have a dumb question.
IF and I sure hope it doesn't happen, but IF several of these teabaggers agcually win in Nov. I think they are as angry with the establishment Pubs as they are with the Dems. so that means they won't want to vote with either party. What is their alternative if they refuse to vote with either party?

I know they can always abstain but that doesn't ge them anywhere and there's arn't enough of them to get their own way on anything either.

What are we looking at here? Does that mean even more stagnation than we've had for the last 2 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a dumb question; instead, it's a smart question about dumb people
It must be remembered that, at the end of the day, TeaBaggers are Republicans, no matter how hard the MSM tries to make them seem like idealistic Independents. Given the choice between any Democrat and any Republican, it's safe to say that the TeaBaggers will vote for the latter.

They will vote with their true party--the Republicans. Of course, if they get actual TeaBagger candidates into Congress, so much the better (in their view). As far as they're concerned, rampant government corruption, out-of-control spending, and the dreaded nanny-state are only a problem when other people's candidates are in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Won't go along w Dems, or prolly w repugs in many matters,
so in certain situations, more stagnation, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. The tea party candidates are Republicans. They will caucus with the Republicans.
They'll be treated as the leaders of the party, the basis for victory in 2012. In truth, their greatest strength is the most Americans don't really know who they are. They have yet to be fully identified as an exclusively right-wing movement. Low information voters may think that they are screw-everyone centrists, with no Party ID. Eventually, everyone will hopefully understand that they are little more than the GOP base.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have no idea about the stagnation factor.
However there appear to be several different flavors of Tea Bagging candidates.

You have your Ron Paul types, who actually make sense in terms of financial oversight and what not. Several of these people are not any scarier than Dennis Kucinich. Though none of them are going to be protective of a woman's right to choice. And I am not sure if any of those people are even in the running for office at this point -the Tea Bagger movement has been hijacked by more diabolical forces.

So now you have the Tea Baggers who start out saying things that make sense, but two paragraphs into their speech start saying, "So what we need to do is to turn our nation back over to God." And their notion of God is a scary one. I start thinking about "The Handmaiden's Tale," when I hear them offering up their idea of what this nation needs to become.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do you think that nitwit O'Donnell is angry? She was recruited because
she's cute. Seriously, this woman doesn't have a political brain in her head, and that's pretty obvious. But look what she did.

It's disheartening, but not overwhelming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. They'll hold hands with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. When The Big Money Lobbyists Come Calling
...with an open checkbook, we'll see their true colors. Green and Red. The rushpublican game is to keep this country in angry mode...along with their big business (teabagger moneybags) and shut the government down. They want to make this administration look as weak as possible as this strategery has been working. Seems the "conventional wisdom" are that voters are shortsighted and stupid...they've forgotten who got us into this mess and that it's all the Democrat's fault. When the baggers get to DC they'll gladly take the corporate money and pay back the IOUs to their buddies at Koch Industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. All that may well be true, but I think the predictors have a valid point
when they sayBoner & McConnell (although Mitch probably won't have the chance) are agoing to have their hands full with this new bunch. They're very unlikely to accept being bossed around like Pubs usually do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC