Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's to the Tea Party for Taking Over Their Party.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:50 PM
Original message
Here's to the Tea Party for Taking Over Their Party.
The inmates have taken over their asylum.

And I'd rather have our candidates run against tea-baggers than mainstream, button-down, country club, corporate Republicans. It enhances our candidates chances.

And even if our Democrats lose some seats to tea-baggers, well I see good in even that defeat because...

Whether it is zealous nationalism, neo-nazism, rabid homophobia, blatant racism, inflammatory xenophobia and anti-environmentalism, the tea-baggers make no pretense of who they are which is the true core of the Republican Party. The Tea-Baggers have been played like violins for years by the country-club Republicans and now they will, even if they win some elections, make mainstream Republicans squirm.

And more importantly, even big corporations will be uncomfortable working with these crazies. I expect to see more corporate cash moving to the Democrats because business likes stability and they hate radicalism and unpredictability and ideologues.

The bags of tea that wound up being tossed out of the ship in this Tea Party won't be incumbent Democrats, but incumbent Republicans.

Tonight I love them. They are the final elixir condensed down to the ultimate reduction of what the Republican Party is.

As someone said a few years back, the Republican River is running low and when it does people can see how ugly it is down on the river bottom.

Tonight the Republican River got even lower.

I think our chances in November, in spite of the polls, in spite of some mis-steps by Obama and the Democrats, are really surged.

If the Democratic Party was a stock, I'd buy now because the expectations are lower than what the reality will be in November.

The Tea Party will be a good thing for Democrats in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Buy !
1000 shares!

Agree. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. +1
1,000 shares!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks. You are a gem, and
I agree with you. I'd buy now, too, because the gop is batshit crazy, and who can negotiate the baggers vs. the rethugs? Such a mess!

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That means a lot to me coming from you, babylonsister.
We are united now all against the common enemy: the Republican Party. A gem? Shucks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good news for Dems
The Great Teabag Takeover has mainstream GOPers shitting bricks. And hopefully, losing elections for their party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, welcome to the DU regardless of the fact that we disagree.
I was being kind to the Tea Baggers. Sweeping generalization and sweeping indictment. I stand guilty as charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. WTF
Edited on Wed Sep-15-10 12:37 AM by Skittles
do not encourage trolls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well, it was his very first post here.
I was honored a troll chose my thread to un-lurk, if only for a brief moment. :)

I almost made a snide remark, but it was his Post #1 and, well, I just didn't pull out the shotgun. But you are right. They should not be encouraged, Skittles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Reached a grand total of 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOLOL
Edited on Wed Sep-15-10 12:38 AM by Skittles
"unhappy with Washington"? Why is that those fucking teabaggers were silent when bush was wiping his ass with the Constitution and sending America off an economic cliff???? Teabaggers simply took over the job of embarrassing America when their hero bush left office - they suck beyond BELIEF. And who do you think you're kidding with this "WE" shit????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. You're right.
Edited on Wed Sep-15-10 01:22 AM by Commie Pinko Dirtbag
"Tea Party participants shouldn't be labeled zealous nationalists, neo-nazism, rabid homophobes, blatant racists, inflammatory xenophobes and anti-environmentalists as a group."

Correct. Each Tea Party participant Teabagger should be labeled a zealous nationalist, neo-nazi, rabid homophobe, blatant racist, inflammatory xenophobe and anti-environmentalist individually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. LOL.
How true. Truth in labeling and truth in advertising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. And a sexual deviant
Though many find teabagging a fun part of their repertoire, I'm fairly sure it isn't in The Vanilla Guide to Sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's their monster.
I say, tough shit. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pezDispenser Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. be careful what you wish for
I agree, there are going to be some dem losses turned wins with some tea-bagger wins. And there will be some tea-baggers that the GOP has to govern with when all is said an done.

This may cause the center right money/votes move to the democratic party. People who label themselves 'socially liberal / fiscally conservative' and typically pull the R lever. What we need now is leadership. Leadership that will fold the new dems into the mix with the moderates and progressives peacefully. Leadership that the GOP lacked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. And if you know Republican Party history like I know it you will give credit to where it is due


George Bush and John McCain.


When there is no clear leader in the Republican Party the economic/defense conservatives and the social/religious conservatives fight for control.

This goes back a long time but the fight with Rockfeller/Goldwater was the clearest example.

Democrats fight all of the time but we make up.

Republicans truely hate each other (in my teens I worked in Republican politics.)

As long as there is a clear leader then everyone will be quiet. If the leadership is open then they will fight like hell because they see it as control over the next few decades.

When George Bush picked Cheney he ensured that 2008 would be a bloody fight for the nomination, and many wounds still existed. Because Cheney could not run for President the ambiguity meant that from 2004 the divisions would harden. Romney/Huckelbee hatred is the reflection of the Rockfeller/Goldwater fight. Huckelbee stayed in the race after it was lost simply to get more delegates than Romney and to be able to undermine Romney's ability to claim party leadership.

When McCain picked Palin, who obviously couldn't be the leader of the party, he compounded Bush's error and guaranteed another 8 years of infighting. The religious/social right has repackaged themselves as a grass roots Tea Party but no one is fooled. They are going around and taking out the last remnants of the Rockfeller wing of the Republican Party and even conservatives who are not completely batshit crazy.

The fight for the Republican Party Presidential nomination in 2012 will be the most bloody yet. They will be willing to lose the election in order to get control for 2016 when they have a reasonable chance to win the Presidency. The strategists behind this know that the electoral college makes it almost impossible for a popular Democratic incumbant President to be defeated. They are unlikely to improve on any of the big states that they lost in 2008 and the President always has a tremendous media advantage.


So once again thanks again George Bush and John McCain for this latest Republican civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anAustralianobserver Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Very interesting analysis.
It fits in with Glenn Beck's televangelist tack. I wonder if Pawlenty could be supported by both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Fascinating perspective.
It's the country club Republicans vs their crazy minions now. 2012 will be a circus with even John Bolton now chiming in.

I enjoyed reading your perspective. Democrats might learn from this ourselves and ask would Biden be the best choice for Obama in 2012 to run with or would Hillary be better as to preventing a food fight in 2016? Just wondering.

McCain's picking Palin, as you said, really tore this thing apart. But I'd never considered Huckabee being a stalker against Romney for McCain long after he couldn't win anymore. It certainly is plausible. McCain owes everything to Charlie Crist who he used and then tossed to the wolves. McCain is all about McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I believe that Democrats are different

We don't like our leaders appointed. When they take over a franchise they don't really rally the country.

Humphrey - fail

Mondale - fail

and I believe that if Gore had fought for the nomination he would have been a much better candidate.


We have to fight it out but IMHO there is more genuine affection between the different groups so that after a good fight we can get back together.

The real story of Obama/Clinton was that after a brutal fight an upstart was able to take on the Democratic heirarchy win and then 95% were able to get together and make up.

Last night CNN reported that 44% of Castle supporters will not vote for O'Donnell.

There is less bad blood between Nader and Democrat supporters than there are between factions of the Republican Party. They can only function with a leader in place.

If the Republicans do not resolve the leadership crises in the party by 2012 it is very possible that you will see formations of another conservative party in rural areas to start 'taking back America'.


I would be happy to see SOS Clinton run for President. She should be viewed as a seperate entity from her husband.

It will be interesting to see if there is another generation of Democratic leaders tat would fight it out for leadership.

We fight, we make up, we continue on.

Republicans keep track and get even.

In my teenage years I worked for Dan Evans, Slade Gorton, Lud Kramer (Wn State Governor, Attny General and SOS). In Wn State they were more liberal than the 'Scoop' Jackson machine.

The only one that is still around from that group is Sam Reed. His parents lived a few blocks from my house and I practically lived over there during the election season.

Sam is now SOS and during the last Gubenatorial election that was decided by a couple dozen votes he refused to break the rules for the Republicans and certified the Democrat the winner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yeah, they've basically exposed the "base" of the party to the moderates now
Thanks guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. I don't welcome it. Because it means if the democrats don't deliver, the country gets
taken over by the far-right, theocratic, nazi-like crazies.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
20. I hope we gain seats in the House and even in the Senate
Especially in the Senate. Wanna know why? They've spent the last two years telling us that they didn't have enough of a majority to get much of anything done when the Republicans were quite capable of getting heinous things accomplished with smaller majorities. Hell, they're still managing to be pretty damn strong as a minority party.

If we get supermajorities, it's going to be like watching the contortionists from Cirque Du Soleil. "Our side" has no intention of doing anything for anyone but the moneyed elite and the corporations, who really run this country, but "our side" has this compulsion to try to get us to believe they really intend to, if only........

I'm voting straight Democratic ticket just to spite them. Hell, I might even canvass independents (undecideds) on just that idea.

Pass the fucking popcorn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southmost Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. +1!
Most Dems are already master triangulating contortionists.

Destroying the current establishment media and conventional wisdom beltway meme (of lack of liberal enthusiasm) has become my main motivation for volunteering and voting straight Dem this election cycle.

Plus, I just loath repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. I certainly hate what they've become
But I actually remember a time when, while I disagreed with their point of view, I could see that many of them had convictions, that while different from my own, were honorable enough. These days, those ones have run screaming from the party. The lunatics are running that asylum, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. More "corporate cash" going to the Dems is not a good thing though... it implies patronage.

Just look at BP and all the scummy GOOP politicians who defended them. Do WE really want to be a part of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstTimeVoterAt37 Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. We MUST keep cameras in their faces
If we do, I really think November is going to be sweeeeeeeet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. Take. Nothing. For. Granted.
Just because the Crazy is strong in them, it's no reason to rest on our laurels. In fact, that's exactly the reason why we mustn't. If we don't mobilize the Disgusted wing of our own party, they (the douche baggers) will surf their momentum right to Capitol Hill.

Every one of us must vote, and make sure all of our Dem/Indy friends vote, too. We have to treat this election as if we're in deep trouble, because we will be if we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. We have no laurels to rest on, but you're right anyway
Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. Let's hear it for the Tea Partiers and their vision of America's future
Follow the Leader.

Please click here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. It's like we're living the ending of T2.
The GOP has been frozen, pushed down, shattered, and has now re-emerged as the scarier tea party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC