http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/docs/O%27Donnell%20Complaint%20ISI.PDFCHECK IT OUT.....particularly # 109, it's really facinating, somebody who makes a living as an apologist for "small government" and "conservatism" and "getting the Federal government off business's backs" and etc. claims she NEEDS FEDERAL LAW TO SAVE HER FROM BEING VICTIMIZED BY "CONSERVATIVE BELIEFS"
=============
BECAUSE OF I.S.I.'s CONSERVATIVE BELIEFS, SUBSCRIBING TO A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION OF GENDER ROLES, DURING MISS O'DONNELL'S EMPLOYMENT I.S.I. EXPRESSED IT'S ORGANIZATIONAL BELIEFS THAT WOMEN MUST SERVE UNDER A MAN'S SUPERVISION OR "COVERING" AND SHOULD NOT HAVE AUTHORITY WITHOUT BEING UNDER THE HEADSHIP AND AUTHORITY OF A MAN
=============
Her entire job is pushing "conservative beliefs" then she asks the EEOC to protect her from and she SPECIFICALLY says that the "conservative" bent of the office is WHY she was treated unfairly. TOO MUCH!!
I always wonder if these think tank peeps ever mean any of the shit they put out there, how much of it is "just pay me to say what you want me to say."