Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Corn--the subsidized crop

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yellowwood Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 06:27 AM
Original message
Corn--the subsidized crop
We see that the high fructose corn producers want to change its name to "corn sugar." They, along with the rest of the corn producing industry has to find more ways to udr use the huge crop of corn being produced in the Midwest.

Why so much corn? Subsidies. Drive through the Midwest, and you'll see huge storage containers just full of the stuff. Bumper crop this year. Want to know how much the megafarmers are getting for growing too much corn?
http://farm.ewg.org/

They have to think of new ways to get rid of it--more for cars, more ways to cram it into our bodies to make the most obese country.
http://www.sweetdisguise.com/

Think that it's environmentally benign? It must be planted, herbicided, pesticided, fertilized. Corn depletes the soil. On fields that have long history of corn planting, the land is several feet lower than the land where it is not planted.
And orn ethanol takes a lot of oil to process.

Meanwhile, the corn crop replaces other crops of foods that would be nutritious to us and the world.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Them corn people are sure lobbying the EPA to incease use in gasoline..
The only people making out on it are the growers. It produces less BTU's. I have an E-85 vehicle and a tank of that burns faster than a tank of regular while delivering less miles. Of course it expensive if you have an older car or a classic.

http://echo.bluehornet.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=b6cf1e7b6bcc1df812b8f5961d60961b&CID=1835386980&ch=311187D4896048C93B2A8C33139EF2C4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree 100%. New ads are out claiming HFCS is just the same as any sugar.
You're also correct about Ethanol requiring more energy to create than it provides as a fuel.

Allow me to add that when it's used as feedstock for meat products, you have another gross inefficiency in using land to provide nutrition.

If corn growers had to compete without subsidies, and if we would require more prominent labeling of ingredients so that we don't have to look at tiny lettering to see if the "healthy" yogurt, etc., we are buying is loaded with HFCS or not, we'd become a healthier society and planet.

I am boycotting all HFCS products and I've written letters to a few food conglomerates.

If there's an anti-HFCS campaign out there, please post it and I'll sign on.

Fuckers.

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowwood Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Look at this Link
http://www.sweetdisguise.com/

I really believe that this corn situation has reached crisis proportions. It is the fault of the subsidies. Farmers plant what makes the most money, and now the subsidies cause them to grow surplus corn that they have to find a use for.

If we must subsidize, why not broccoli?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Its not just the Midwest... its here in the South too.

When I was a young'un, there were farmer's fields across from my school. Every season would be a different planting. Cotton, soybeans, peanuts, corn, wheat, etc.

The past 5 years or so it has been corn every single season. No crop rotation at all. I'm afraid all this monoculture, along with the droughts the Southeast usually has in the summers are going to lead to dust bowl type conditions. I know that we have trees and mountains unlike the prairie, so maybe it won't be that bad. But the corn subsidies are definitely ruining the land and agriculture in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Easy fix to the land problem
We can take the oil we save from converting corn to ethanol and use it to make more fertilizers to grow the corn we need to reduce our dependence on oil.

Should work perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Effective September 14, 2010: HFCS ----> "CORN SUGAR"
Deserving of it's own OP, we have a marketing strategy to call HFCS "Corn Sugar", doesn't that sound better and healthier?

From wikipedia HFCS page:

Name change to corn sugar

On September 14, 2010, The Corn Refiners Association applied for permission to use the name "corn sugar" in place of high fructose corn syrup on food labels for products sold in the United States. According to a press release, "Consumers need to know what is in their foods and where their foods come from and we want to be clear with them," said CRA president Audrae Erickson. "The term 'corn sugar' succinctly and accurately describes what this natural ingredient is and where it comes from – corn." <78>

The association however did not provide clarification as to a change in what the FDA already considers corn sugar, i.e., dextrose<79> or any of the other corn-derived sugars such as corn syrup and maltodextrin.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Legalize industrial hemp. It's a far more useful crop
that could turn half of all corn growers into former corn growers.

We have Nixon to thank for the subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. And the skeptic patrol arives in ...
5,4,3,2,1.

Cue PronSyrup, et. al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hey, MA.
OP didn't really say anything, so there's not much to debunk yet.

But if you want to start in with the "OMG, HFCS is sapping our precious bodily fluids" conspiracy shit, I'll be happy to debunk you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC