Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

These two things can't possibly both be true

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:32 PM
Original message
These two things can't possibly both be true

1. The new "advisory" position that Elizabeth Warren quit her job at Harvard to accept has no power and is a meaningless appointment meant to placate disgruntled progressives.

2. Elizabeth Warren is an intelligent, accomplished woman of impeccable character and wisdom who is a champion of progressive economic values.


If 1 is true, then 2 is false. If 2 is true, then 1 is false.


Personally... I think Warren is outstanding, intelligent, and has all the right viewpoints and experience.


If you think this Advisory job is meaningless, then you think Warren is stupid or a sell-out. You also have to believe that Rachel Maddow is a cheerleading stooge of the administration.



Those that want to downplay this appointment, or find a way to use it as yet more proof that Obama doesn't care about progressives, are in a box.


Which is it?

Is Warren stupid and/or a sellout? or are you wrong about Obama this time?

There's no other option.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great post! I think maybe the pessimism about President Obama was wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. This substitute appointment only shows an Administration afraid to stand up to the minority Party.
It's like being afraid of a scary midget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There's one vote for the "Warren is stupid or a sell out" side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Or afraid to stand up FOR THE PEOPLE. I think Warren knows she's the only thing standing between us
and the thieves. She'll do her best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I find the prevalence of point 1 very insulting to Ms. Warren.
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Well, it seems clear that some who said they wanted Warren to
run this agency only wanted attention. I can't think of any other explanation for the current downplaying of this appointment. She will begin organizing the agency very shortly and will end up being nominated for the post in good time. In the meantime, it will be her agency.

And for those who whine about her working for Geithner, I would remind them that Geithner has a boss, too, who can say, "Make it so, Timothy. Make it so."

I'm alarmed, but not surprised, that some are denigrating this important appointment. For what reason they might be doing that, I have only suspicions, which will remain unstated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think there may be something wrong with your logic.
the job could, theoretically, be meant to placate progressives, and/or be "meaningless", and Warren might just be mistaken. That is, neither stupid nor a sell-out.


However, I actually think it's a great move, and one of the things that Obama has done that I'm unambiguously happy about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If one thinks she's mistaken, then that is an indictment of her credentials for the job

I think she's smarter than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And if she's not smarter than that, she shouldn't have the job.
So, I believe she is, indeed, smarter than that, and much smarter than the current crop of detractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. What they tell her now and what they allow her to do....
then are two different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So you are saying she is naive and
...didn't get some guarantees up front.


Got it.



I disagree with you and think much more highly of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. It seems like many progressives just aren't sure
Mr. Obama can be trusted. There is a sense that he's gaming this business; trying to have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC