I think that voters in these elections are more motivated to the polls to vote against something or someone, than in defense of some policy or political position. I think the crazy talk of republicans and tea-baggers should be highlighted by our party at every opportunity. Charles Blow at the NYT disagrees with me . . .
The Grand IllusionBy CHARLES M. BLOW
Published: September 17, 2010
Let me be clear: the idea of an inevitable Republican landslide in November is not a foregone conclusion. It’s a self-perpetuating bit of wishful thinking that’s gaining currency through the force of being recycled ad nauseam by overzealous pundits.
It’s no wonder then that Democrats with defeatist tendencies have bought into it. They are morose and slumped, prematurely assuming the crestfallen posture of a party rejected, rending their garments like a PETA spokeswoman in a meat dress.
Sure, some seats will change party control, but a landslide is hardly certain, particularly if Democrats can change their tune and energize their base. A New York Times/CBS News poll released this week asked respondents whom they would vote for in their own districts if the midterms were held today. Among those the poll determined to be likely voters, Republican candidates held a small edge. (Likely voter models are used to make predictions about the midterms.) However, among all registered voters, Democrats held a larger edge.
___ The Democrat’s strategy of highlighting the scary Tea Party-supported candidates isn’t working for them. Fear factors don’t provide much traction. They turn off instead of turning out.
These voters came to the polls in 2008 because they were inspired and hopeful, not angry and scared. They need to be inspired anew. Democrats must ignite their fealty, and they must do so with a positive, idea-based message . . .
read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/18/opinion/18blow.html?pagewanted=printMaybe we should do both . . ?