Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich Calls For Federal Ban On Shariah Law In US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:20 PM
Original message
Gingrich Calls For Federal Ban On Shariah Law In US
The second morning of speeches at the Values Voter Summit here in DC was dominated by a man who is swiftly becoming the nation's spokesperson for Islamophobia -- former House speaker Newt Gingrich. Fresh off the release of his Islam-focused film "America At Risk," Gingrich told the crowd at VVS that it's time to take federal action to prevent Shariah Law from infiltrating courtrooms in the US.

"We should have a federal law that says sharia law cannot be recognized by any court in the United States," Gingrich said to a standing ovation from the audience. The law will let judges know, Gingrich said, that "no judge will remain in office that tried to use sharia law."

Gingrich made a not-so-subtle reference to the right wing meme about freshly-minted Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan which claims that Kagan is "sympathetic" to Shariah and -- as some suggested during her confirmation hearings -- might allow it to be recognized as law in the United States.

But beyond the Kagan hit, Gingrich's anti-Shariah talk inserted him directly into the most extreme end of the Islamophobic push-back against mosque projects all over the country.

~snip~
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/gingrich-calls-for-federal-law-banning-shariah-law-in-us.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1.  I guess his infidelities still weigh on him.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You mean like he doesn't want to get stoned to death? Or is
that just a woman's penalty for infidelity??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Men are punished for adultery, too, although I don't know
what their punishment is.

I wonder if they have a punishment for being a lying corrupt sack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Heavily...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Eh, what is the penalty for adultery , Newtie?
under Sahria law? Is THAT what you're scared of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. ????
So if someone wants to live their private live according to those rules, they are not allowed to do so?

I suppose he only wants Sharia law banned so that a Protestant theocracy can be instituted instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. He recently converted to Catholicism.
Nonetheless, I'm sure he would love a protestant theocracy just as much as a Catholic one.

Speaking of religion, he has a really punchable face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. funny the SOB was against the ERA, so it surprises me he is against shariah law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. What has he been smoking lately?
What a nutcase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hey Newt...You still a family values Christian?
What does your ex-wifes think of your hateful political strategy?

you want to lecture the world on morals and religious intolerance!

Your decades of hate-politics, of division and cowardice produced the Tea-baggers, Palin, McVeigh, et al.
America is reaping what you andyour Party has sown for 30 years.

Shut up you Goddamn hypocrite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sad that his moronic audience... wil not be able to distinguish this
for the political stunt it is. I shudder to think how many teabaggers actually believe the courts are using Sharia law in making their determinations.

So, now we know for sure there is no sincerity in Newt's Catholic conversion. Otherwise he might fear the hell he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. i was wondering where this was coming from. have heard others argue allowing sharia law
infilterate our system and didnt know what the fuck they were talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Jesus fucking Christ....
Muslims in North America aren't seeking to impose anything on anyone. I live in a community with a sizable Muslim community, and I do things that violate Islamic law every day. I've never had anyone of any significance argue that the power of the state should be used to compel towards following Islamic law. Conversely, fundamentalist Christians around here often want to imposed a bastardized Mosaic Code on everyone, regardless of creed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Someone ought to tell him about that document called the Constitution.
Turns out that we already have a bunch of laws in this country, with other laws to prevent those from being replaced. This is pretty fucking cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Must be time for a Federal Ban on Gingrich's presence...
in Washington DC.

What a fat little fool he has been and is. He does want to be pretzeldent however so is dangerous. Keep the peach PIT in Georgia where he belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I don't have a problem with him working to increase the strength
of the laws we already have preventing the state establishment of religion. Just change his "Sharia law" to "religious law" and who here would object to it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. What?!?!?!?!?
He is pandering to the least 'hinged' of us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fear-mongering moron-like behavior at it's finest.
Is this how Republicans make friends? Vote for us or die. Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Religious law has never been allowed. Separation of church and state prevents this...
Though Newt and his ilk need to be reminded of that quite often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
18.  I don't think religious court rulings of any faith --
Catholic, Muslim, Jewish -- whatever -- should have any standing in state or federal U.S. Courts.

For example, a Catholic person who has an annulment in a Catholic trial still has to get a civil divorce in order to be legally divorced. That is as it should be.

If a law was written to enshrine that principal into law for all religions, fine -- it would strengthen the wall separating Church and State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Fine with me, so long as we similarly ban all court recognition of Christian law
And ALL religious law, for that matter. We are a nation of religious freedom and secular laws, NOT a Christianized Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. i wonder what version of 'shariah law' is he bitching about.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. So now Newt SUPPORTS separation of church and state? LOL!
Something tells me he didn't think this one through...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. We already have one
It's called "The First Amendment".

What a jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Is there a specific to this? An example or two? I'm lost. What did Kagan say? What was it about?
So lost. Helppppp!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. is newt drunk all the time or on some kind of narcotic? or insane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. I didn't realize that Sharia Law was being practiced here in the US
let alone instituted.

:wtf: is he talking about????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. And does that mean that Jews no longer have to go to rabbis for a "Get" and a
secular court's divorce is enough to remarry?

Or go to the Vatican for an annulment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC