Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scalia: No protection against sex bias, no right to privacy in Constitution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:21 PM
Original message
Scalia: No protection against sex bias, no right to privacy in Constitution
Scalia: No protection against sex bias, no right to privacy in Constitution

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/scalia-protection-sex-bias-privacy-constitution/

By Daniel Tencer
Sunday, September 19th, 2010 -- 12:14 pm

'If the current society wants to outlaw sex discrimination, hey, we have legislatures,' Scalia says

In comments foreshadowing how he might rule on the issue of gay marriage, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has said he believes the US Constitution doesn't provide protection from discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation.

Scalia, a Reagan appointee considered to be a conservative stalwart on the bench, told an audience at UC Hastings Law School in San Francisco that the court's recognition of a constitutional right to privacy -- the basis of Roe v. Wade -- is a "total absurdity," the San Francisco Chronicle reports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. How is Fat Tony?
Eating pizza? Fried chicken? Bacon and eggs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Hopefully he eats deep fried food at least twice a day.
And drinks booze like an old hound at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes
Hope springs eternal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Complete fucking whack-a-doodle, Scalia is.
I will not shed a single tear what that asshole dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Roman Catholic church has no right to a tax exemption, either
and neither does any other church.

Dead letter literalists can be bitten--HARD--when other people play the game.

Oh, and the right to privacy is certainly implied by the Fourth Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. No question on where he stands, the damned old bigot.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is a corporate merger a corporation pregnancy? And a corporate dissolution a corporate abortion? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. He has no business discussing these matters as they may come
before the Court. I wonder if he is being paid for these speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. No right to privacy? Then let's open up Wall Street's books.
Let's see what the banksters actually spent the bailout on.

Let's see who's actually paying to promote the Teabaggers.

Let's see which businesses are the biggest recipients of corporate welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bingo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Let's do an old fashioned national inquirer-style expose on Opus Dei and Vaffie Scalia nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. not really big on the ninth amendment, eh Fat Tony, you fucking vermin.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rove karl rove Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. America: No protection against Antonin Scalia n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. there's that much vaunted conservative respect for precedence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC