|
A fair trial is not some gift our benevolent government gives to the citizens because it's just oh-so fucking nice. A fair trial is one of the barriers that stands in between us little people and abusive politicians.
Some around here are pushing the idea that there's a special class of criminals that's just so awful and so dangerous that they don't _deserve_ a trial. Funny, I used to hear that crap only from republicans. OK, let me ask you this: how do we know that someone accused of being in that class has been accused justly? If you give someone the power to damn people without recourse, how do you know he won't go damning personal enemies and scapegoats?
Well, you don't; that's where the universal fair trial comes into play. Nobody gets to pass judgment without review--not even the POTUS. Throughout the Constitution and Bill of Rights--remember those old things?--one of the pervasive themes is a distrust of an over-concentration of power. It's a really good system--and we're going to throw it out because guys like Awlaki are assholes?
It's absolutely disgusting what Obama has done WRT Awlaki, regardless of how terrible the guy really is. And you can't blame the congressional republicans for this one.
Don't even try to feed me that line of bullshit about how dangerous the guy might hypothetically be. Our worst terrorist attack ever wasted fewer lives than the current wars that the administration can't bring itself to stop. Dead bodies are apparently not a concern of theirs.
I agree with the other posters: Much of the outrage around here over Bush's actions weren't about the actions, but about the political affiliation of Bush.
|