Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military thwarted President seeking choice in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:03 PM
Original message
Military thwarted President seeking choice in Afghanistan
President Obama was on edge.

For two exhausting months, he had been asking military advisers to give him a range of options for the war in Afghanistan. Instead, he felt that they were steering him toward one outcome and thwarting his search for an exit plan. He would later tell his White House aides that military leaders were "really cooking this thing in the direction they wanted."

He was looking for choices that would limit U.S. involvement and provide a way out. His top three military advisers were unrelenting advocates for 40,000 more troops and an expanded mission that seemed to have no clear end. When his national security team gathered in the White House Situation Room on Veterans Day, Nov. 11, 2009, for its eighth strategy review session, the president erupted.

"So what's my option? You have given me one option," Obama said, directly challenging the military leadership at the table, including Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, then head of U.S. Central Command.

"We were going to meet here today to talk about three options," Obama said sternly. "You agreed to go back and work those up."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/26/AR2010092603766_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The POTUS is the CIC, boss, if you will, of the military. This really
ticks me off. Obama is to tell them, dictate if that's what it comes down to, what he wants. Give the friggin orders to the generals and make them do what you want. This is NOT difficult. I'm going out now to look for some spines for the dems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did the military force him to use his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech
to stump for more war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No congress
From what I'm being told around here constantly, he was forced to do that by the Senate filibuster some how. We apparently just don't understand how congress works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, what happened?
Did the President dismiss the advisors who failed him, or did he reward them by following their recommendation? I hope they were sufficiently impressed by stern words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, so much for the "Civilian controlled military" myth.
The mistake was, and continues to be, sending the military to deal with a diplomatic/criminal action.

Kinda like hiring a blind rhinoceros to do brain surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC