Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The DIRTY Little Secret About LIKELY VOTERS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:02 PM
Original message
The DIRTY Little Secret About LIKELY VOTERS
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 02:19 PM by Beetwasher
Most "Likely Voter" screens do not include first time voters. There were SHITLOADS of them last election voting for Dems and Obama. Even if these people tell a poster they ARE likely to vote, if last election was their first time, they are usually NOT included. Now, there will be a lot of attrition in this group, of course, but no one really knows how much. Just remember that when you see numbers for "likely voters".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not dirty.
Not little.

Not secret.

Not likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You Think Most People Know This Information?
What's "Not Likely"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Answer #1: No.
Answer #2: "Pollster" grift.



:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Pollster Grift? Explain
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ignore the polls. Most are designed...
...to shape opinion, not measure it.

There's only one poll that matters. Please vote on Nov 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The real "dirty little secret" is neither this election or any subsequent are going
to be decided by anyone likely to be "polled" . Most legit pollsters admit that.And this election and future elections are going to be decided by the largest group of voters in the nation, the Independents. And the Indies owe their loyalty to NO party.And despite Democratic claims to the contrary, anyone who has been working with the "persuadable voter universe" can tell you, they are just as likely to be right leaning as left. Not long ago, it was a forgone conclusion the Indies leaned left. No so anymore. It is now a crap shoot. And both the GOP and the Dems have been marginalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. First TimeVoters Were HUGE In The Last Election
And voted overwhelmingly for Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Yes, and they are the ones who are most upset about the way the Dems are running things.
Sure, we lefties are upset, too, but we are still likely to vote against Republcians, even if we are not actually voting for Dems. But the indies will either stay home or vote Republican, because they are not as convinced as we are that the Republcians are the evil disaster for the country that they really are. They owe no loyalty at all to the Dems. Their mantra is "What have they done for me lately," and they expect immediate gratification. They will turn on a dime, and even if they voted Dem in the last election, they are just as likely to vote Republican in this one--probably even more so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No They're Not, Source That Claim, It's Nonsense
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Well, my direct experience with canvassing and manning the phones indicates the Indies are not as
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 12:54 PM by saracat
likely as they were to vote at all OR vote Dem. Yesterday evening I had the majority of Indies that I was able to speak with responding that they weren't planning to vote. I also encountered quite a few Dems who had changed their registration while canvassing and they also said they wouldn't vote Dem. And most of the Indies I have been calling were NOT first time voters.Most were either former Dems or Repugs. The good news is in many cases we still do maintain a slight lead among those Indies who still intend to vote but we by no means have the support we did previously.And this is known by our internal polling.
We can pull this election out of the bag but it is going to be very tough and is going to take a lot of work and dedication.But we must prevail. There is no other choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. IOW, You Can't Source It All You Have Is Your Anectdotes. Got It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. That's total bullshit. You might wish it were true, though. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Excuse me? Did you just call me a troll or a Republican plant?
It sure as hell sounds like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. It's his MO.
Yesterday he accused me of lying about having been an Obama volunteer in 2008. They just can't fathom that a whole shitload of us who loved and supported him whole-heartedly are now upset about the way he is governing.

Hell, I will never forget the moment that I VOTED for him. I stood in the booth for about five minutes before casting my vote with tears running down my face. I wanted that moment to last - not only was it historic, I was REALLY HAPPY to vote for him. For the first time, I wasn't merely voting against someone. And when he actually WON that night...let's just say I was a hot mess.

Sorry, guess I just needed to vent a little. It pisses me off to no end to be called a PUMA, or a racist, or whatever else we'll be called tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Well, I alerted on that post of his. I don't know whether anyone will even
Edited on Wed Sep-29-10 03:15 PM by tblue37
say anything to him about such crap, but I think they definitely should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, we are going to kill the repukes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Who Said That? Did I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. No, I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. And What's Your Point? You Believe That?
If you don't then I assume you're attempting being sarcastic, implying I said that or meant that. Which I didn't, so it's dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You are quite the over thinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Why Don't You Just Come Out And Say What You Mean? Too Afraid I've Got You Pegged?
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 08:00 PM by Beetwasher
Unless you honestly believe we're going to "kill the repubs", in which case, you're pretty naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. I just enjoy the ease with which your buttons get pushed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. IOW, You'd Rather Speak Cryptically Than Be Honest About Your Opinions
Edited on Wed Sep-29-10 09:44 AM by Beetwasher
Got it! Some people might say that's pretty cowardly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Can't resist, can ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Can't Explain Yourself, Can Ya?
Thanks for the kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Likely voters are registered voters who actually have a history of
voting in every election. Heavily Republican. Pew has
explained that Likely Voters are more likely to be Republican
because they are better off and see themselves as having a
real stake in the outcome of election.

More Democrats are Registered but cannot be depended on
to come out to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Actually Each Outfit Has It's Own Screen And There Are Varying Definitions
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 02:27 PM by Beetwasher
But for the most part what you say is true and supports what I said: first time voters are NOT included. Most Likely voter screens contain voters who have shown a repeated pattern of regular voting. New voters were a HUGE factor in '08 and could be again, depending on the attrition rate, which no one can accurately determine. It's a wild card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's probably true. And another thing...
I'd like to know where polling companies get their lists of people to call... I find it hard to believe that these are just random cold calls.

The reason I question this is the fact that I am regularly called by at least 2+ polling companies p/election cycle and this has been going on for about 10 years now. Prior to that however, I can't remember ever having been polled despite never having missed voting in an election from the age of 18 on. I'm 44 now, so for basically my first 16 years of voting, I was persona non grata as far as opinion is concerned, and then suddenly, poof... I get called every election cycle, at least twice if not more.

I'm not complaining... just sort of wondering why out loud. Coincidence? Maybe they didn't do as much polling a decade ago? :shrug:

Very odd imho. If someone more in-the-know about this sort of thing has an explanation or even a theory as to how polling companies come up w/their lists, I'd love to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. since 2003 I have been polled alot..but prior to that I moved alot ..and lived in
9 different states.

Now I live in 2 states, and I get polled at both homes! Although only one is my residence.

In fact I got a call at 9 am this past Saturday. The call woke me..and they got an ear full!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I didn't get called for polls before we owned a home. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. I wonder too
I've never been called in my 19 years of being eligible to vote AND having voted in every single election. Not just national - I even vote on the school board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. ofa is targeting those voters hard.
that is who they are putting on the canvas lists. those folks are getting a knock on the door. they will come out to vote. and if anyone is worried about attrition in that group, find your local ofa and go talk to them. door to door is THE most effective election tactic. and it is a lot of fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Polls are simply not newsworthy.
They shouldn't get more coverage than a brief mention in an article about something meaningful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. The only meaningful polls are exit polls...the rest is nonsense...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. And don't they only poll people who own landlines too?
That alone will skew likely voter models far to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Exact;y . . . cell phones are usually not on call lists.
Also, there's caller ID. Everyone I know screens out any call that's not a real person who they actually know. Phone polling (and phone banking) is becoming archaic and less effective. The grassroots has to invent new, creative ways to reach out to voters or the candidate with the most media buys (i.e., money) will win.

That said, the polls do help create a self-fulfilling prophesy. The latest poll results lead the news and provide fodder for the gasbags. It's the corporate media's way of creating a perpetual horse race - more viewers, more pseudo-controversy for the talk shows, and more ad money.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. All "likely voter" schemes assume the voting future will be similar to the voting past.
Hence, it is an inherently conservative selection criteria.

Yet observation shows that this is false, and in fact change is accelerating all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC