Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Cheney's Handwritten Notes Implicate Bush in Plame Affair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:39 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Cheney's Handwritten Notes Implicate Bush in Plame Affair
BREAKING: Cheney's Handwritten Notes Implicate Bush in Plame Affair
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/013107Z.shtml
Copies of handwritten notes by Vice President Dick Cheney, introduced at
trial by defense attorneys for former White House staffer I. Lewis
"Scooter" Libby, would appear to implicate George W. Bush in the Plame
CIA Leak case.



Hadn't seen this anywhere. Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, do I hope this is true.
Well, yes and no. If they go down for this, does that prevent all the other shit they've done from ever truly being exposed?

*fingers crossed*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
55. Um, it's JASON LEOPOLD. LEOPOLD ALERT
LEOPOLD ALERT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
66. The baby jesus forgives thieves, robbers and mass murderers
all the time. Can't you forgive someone for getting one story wrong?

Jeez, give it a rest already and quit stirring the pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #55
73. The story is based on gov't exhibits this time
not "anonymous sources." So while normally I'd agree with you, it appears legit this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #73
89. ooh, this would be sweet
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 07:26 AM by 2008
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
77. Here is the actual note:


Bush is GUILTY and Fitz knows it. He's establishing the beginnings of a case against Bush himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Dammit.
The "meat grinder" reference came a week too late. I played Mark Silverman's "Don't Stick Your Dick In A Blender" last week, and this would have been the perfect tie-in for playing it.

Leave it to Cheney to use such descriptive terms. Little does he know it's HIS dick that's in the meat grinder now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #77
90. Fitz isn't doing anything except not prosecuting anyone else.
This document was submitted by Scooter Libby's defense team. It's not admissible evidence in any other case at this time because there is nobody else charged with a crime.

At this point, if Fitzgerald really does entertain the thought of prosecuting someone else there's only a remote possibility that the person would have to appear in court even in the final months of the Bush Administration.

That's it. They got away with it. The only remaining question is whether they all got away with it, or all minus one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #90
94. Shouldn't it be marked Defense Exhibit instead of Government if
it was put in by Libby's lawyers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. Exactly, it is listed as Government Exhibit GX 532
Fitzgerald has referred to this note repeatedly, as recently as this morning in discussions between the judge, himself, and the defense. It has been part of Fitzgerald's argument in trying to get clips of Scottie's press briefings showing, first, that only Rove was being defended and, later, after prodding by Libby/Cheney, to defend both Libby and Rove.

The defense used to Government exhibit to point out the crossed-out words (the/this Pres.) and have Addington confirm that was his reading of them as well.

Interestingly, the note is being used by both the prosecution and the defense; the prosecution to show Libby's state of mind, how focused he was on this, etc; the defense to show Libby was being "scapegoated" in order to protect Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. Ah, then I stand corrected.
I was confusing this entry into the evidence with previous revelations, with all of the more interesting ones recently (except this) coming from Scooter's defense team.

Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #77
100. That note does seem to say "the Pres," which is then crossed out
The wheels of truth and justice turn very very slowly, but eventually I think that the majority of people will know that President(?) George W. Bush* revealed the identity of an undercover CIA agent working on terrorism during a war on terrorism that was killing thousands of American soldiers, soldiers from other countries, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Afghan civilians.

I'm just afraid that it will take years before people realize this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. discussion:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x90018


and there was one yesterday I'm not able to track down at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Here, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true please be true
please be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be trueplease be true please be true please be true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ooga Booga Smooga Wooga
for sure

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. SAME HERE! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Yes,Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes....
and please let there be more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. as usual - what she said. it's what I've suspected all along, the bastids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. You can
say that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. What Was It * Said Of The Leak? ......
Something about if someone in the WH is behind it - they will not longer work there. Anybody have a link to that quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. He said they would be taken care of...
If there's a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is," Bush told reporters at an impromptu news conference during a fund-raising stop in Chicago, Illinois. "If the person has violated law, that person will be taken care of.

"I welcome the investigation. I am absolutely confident the Justice Department will do a good job.

"I want to know the truth," the president continued. "Leaks of classified information are bad things."

He added that he did not know of "anybody in my administration who leaked classified information

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/30/wilson.cia/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. LMAO right now... It hadn't occurred to me before, but "taken care of" has TWO very diff. meanings
...LOL, damn this english language.

Yep, Rove is certainly being "taken care of" - as in WELL "taken care of"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
65. He also said...
he didn't know of anybody in HIS administration, wouldn't necessarily apply to himself would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #65
93. He said "classified" - by that point, he'd already de-classified it, retroactively
apparently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
104. As in, "Heckuva job, Brownie"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
84. Thank you. I needed to read those words again, to enjoy the deep, deep, deep
shit that is about to envelop this admin.

Hopefully


If the balls exist for doing what needs to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
105. Of course he didn't know anyone in his administration who
leaked classified information. He did it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Until I see it from a different source, it's in the junk pile...
Sorry it has to be that way, but at this point those two people reporting for Truthout are an unreliable source for this particular story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. Take a look at this: Washington Post referenced 'note'
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/23/AR2007012300125.html

Libby, Wells said, told Cheney he feared "people in the White House are trying to set me up." Wells then showed the jury the text of a note Cheney had jotted that said: "Not going to protect one staffer + sacrifice the guy that was asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder because of the incompetence of others."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
85. Don't be an idiot. Look at the exhibits. For God's sake who are we to judge the timing of this
expose' which has timing issues.

Look at the Leopold articles as having timing issue regarding the "imminent" Rove indictment.

Fitzgerald is peeling back the layers to get to the rotten core.

And Rove may not be the center of rottenness... it might be that Fitzgerald sees something even darker and more rotten than Rove as he gets closer to the center of this mess.

That takes time.

I think Leopold did have a source.

A really good one.

Rove is going down.

Cheney is going down.

If really, really big cojones exist -- Bush will go down too.

I think the jugulars are now exposed and everyone is smelling blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Remember that the president and VP are claiming that they can unilaterally 'de-classify'...
anything they like, therefore, it is impossible for them to break this law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Too much has passed for them to pull out that excuse
If that were true, they could've invoked it day one and
saved Scooter his job. (oh poor poor scooter) - I jest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. They can make all the claims they want.
But it's up to someone else to decide if it's legal or not. What it comes down to is if these guys want to hold on to power they better start kissing ass in the senate. They don't have to be convicted in a criminal court to be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
67. They conceded their guilt ...
... by saying they would go after the leakers.

Their "declassify" excuse won't wash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. But other 'leakers' are not the P and VP, who, they claim, have the right to de-classify on the spot
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 04:35 PM by MookieWilson
The two of them have special rights when it comes to the power to de-classify information. Or so they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. They can say they are fried chickens ...
... and metaphorically, they'd be correct.

Reality, on the other hand ...

:D

Anyway, what they say doesn't amount to a hill of beans ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this the note that has "this Pres" marked through? Or is this a new note?
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 02:46 PM by in_cog_ni_to
Before I go to the link.;)

edited to fix quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. It's the same one. It is pretty conclusive though. I hope it gains enough traction so we can
at least watch the administration flounder around trying to explain it though. Maybe Fitzy has more. Sweet sweet Fitzy.

This whole thing is really quite delicious.
I love watching the bastards twist and it looks like Fitzgerald is just slowly pushing the knife in ... bit by bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. : ) It DOES bring a smile to my face! Fitz has the goods on this cabal
and me thinks they're all in a shitload of trouble.:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
103. Slashing more than stabbing
He has wowed me with quickly cutting right to the top levels. Go Fitz Go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't know how this will play out, but there would be precious little
weeping at my house if this president were found to be involved in an act of treason against Valerie Plame.

As near as I can tell, she was a dutiful American citizen doing her job. There ought not to be a penalty for that.

As near as I can tell, her husband told the truth about the yellow cake scare out of Nigeria. He ought not to have been the subject of petty retaliation and dangerous treason for that.

If a U.S. president lies about a blowjob, I'm not terribly concerned. If it's not my dick it's none of my business.

If a U.S. president subverts the safety of a CIA operative for ANY reason, nevermind no better one than petty revenge, I think corresponding articles of impeachment should be introduced against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Isn't this what we've been talking about here at DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yes. It is. I just went to Truthout and it's the same story. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I just looked, too. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Core of TO story is very similar to DU brainstorming re Cheney memo.
Since the time it was posted to the DOJ website yesterday, I'm sure lots of folks have examined the Cheney memo very carefully. Several brainstorming discussions on DU examined the content of the Cheney's memo, and came to the same conclusion written in today's TO article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well it's Jason Leopold - but looks pretty concrete
We'll have to see if it gets picked up.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Shazaaam !
be still my heart... could it be the bloody glove ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. My theory...
Fitz is going all the way to the TOP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is it treason yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
72. yes. randi rhodes is reporting this: telling us bush was behind this
(look at the cheney note that says "this pres" scratched out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. Man oh mighty holy freaking way
I always knew that there was more to this story... I still believe more is to come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Surprise, surprise ! Not.
They thought they were dictators when they controlled the Congress too.

This treasonous activity, this breach of national security, THESE TRAITORS must be punished!

RULE OF LAW ! Where have we heard that before?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Obstruction of justice?
* acted like he knew nothing of the nasty Plame outing. Had no idea who, if anyone, in his admin could be involved in such a thing. And while he was speaking those words to a camera, recording them for all time, he in fact did know all about it. He was apparently up to his butthole in it.

Knowing that an active investigation was underway, I would say that's obstruction of justice. And I do believe that would also be a felony.

Can you say I M P E A C H M E N T ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. This also establishes ...
the AWOL cowboys "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" moment.

That was when he came out and said that he did not know which senior WH official leaked. He even downplayed the likelyhood of finding the leaker because there were a lot of senior officials in his administration.
He did know, it was all of them (conspiracy), and he lied about it.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. can a president fire himself?
berto? Yo, dude. Mr. Torture! Can I fire myself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Altogether now in your best Scooby-Doo voice, "Ruhroh..." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. what, off with their heads.
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 02:55 PM by alyce douglas
geez, Fitz is working very hard, I think this is what the Dems want, get them both out with one fast swoop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

or is darth cheney going to say this is "hogwash" also. I want to see these guys be served their just dues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. White House lawyers would pick that apart in minutes....
insinuating that's why Cheney crossed it out, because Bush WASN'T involved. I can't see this implicating Bush in any cover-up, as much as I'd like to. They'll need stronger evidence than that. It IS damning evidence against Cheney though and when viewed as a whole it certainly gives one the suspicion that everyone in the White House was involved, including Bush. But alas, suspicion isn't enough to nail the bastard's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. And the citizens in America given this information
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 03:03 PM by dogday
will also make up their minds and if they are anything like I think they are, they will say it does look very similar.....


Won't matter what the lawyers do legally, when the American people get a view of this, it will be worth a second look.... Try tearing that apart...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. The American people?
the same ones who care more about voting on "American Idol" than they do in a Presidential election? Americans are notoriously slow to react to anything. Look how long it took them to wise up to the fact that Bush is a complete imbecile. Granted, they are doing better now but with a corporate media that remains steadfastly behind Bush they have to actually HEAR about it before they can react to it. A majority of Americans believe what someone tells them to believe. Sad, but true.

Don't get me wrong, I'd LOVE to believe that Bush and Co. will get what's coming to them but I don't share your confidence in the average American doing what's right. I've been disappointed in them far too many times for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. They did in November and
his popularity is in the crapper... We know it is about public opinion and I believe public opinion will be high on this.... Don't sell the American people short, that is always the first mistake...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
80. How do you know? Circumstantial evidence comes down to opinion.
It could be viewed as unpersuasive, persuasive or totally compelling to all but an idiot - as in the case of the creep who murdered his wife and told his girl-friend on the phone they wouldn't have long to wait, and left a trail of other indicators, in their totality, utterly compelling! Or as in the case of the Republican electoral fraud and otherwise inexplicable obscurantism. They wouldn't let the sniffer dogs near their luggage, as Ernest Partridge put it! "Stop it! Stop it! Get those damn dogs away!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. Does Leopold read DU? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Betcha he does. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. There's at least a remote possibility...
:rofl:

Honestly, there's gotta be alot of people scrutinizing Cheney's memo right now. Shouldn't be too surprising that at least several people interpret it the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I saw your thread Tin Man,
don't be surprised if you turn up as an unnamed source somewhere .....:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. No, it's a logical conclusion.
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 03:10 PM by Marie26
And hey, even if it came from the DU thread, that's more exposure for your analysis. I like how Fitzgerald is just releasing all this info for liberal bloggers to investigate. He's trying to silently chip away at the wall of secrecy the Administration has built - and that's more valuable than a perjury conviction, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
101. I'd think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. .
Worst Administration ever? And not even in a close race?
Yeah, their war on terror obviously also means war for political reasons against those whose job is to find out about potential WMDs that could be used against the US. Good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. There was a DU thread on this
yesterday. Tin Man, Spazito & others pointed out that the scribbled "this Pres" seemed to refer to Bush.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x85018#86917
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
40. Bush and Cheney hatched the plan together...
and sent their minions Libby and Rove out to "make it happen".

Bush "decided" to throw Libby under the bus to protect Karl, and thus, himself. Cheney can't be too happy about this.

Remember that early on in the investigation, both Bush and Cheney retained counsel, highly unusual, so quite obviously they were both involved, finding the proof however, will be difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. the Decider decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
47. Beeyooteeful.
Can we get him impeached now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
48. Holy shit .. this is "Hugh!!11!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. They're screwn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #50
60. Do you feel dirty when you type like them?
I sure do.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Heheheh!
A little! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
51. If that ain't treasonous, then what is?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
82. lying about a blow job is obviously much worse.
I always thought that Clinton's two major crimes were
a) picking ugly women
b) relying on polls to decide policy.

Cheney is actively involved in having people killed. 100,000 Iraqis, at the very least. 3000+ soldiers from the US. until they changed the parameters, even the DOD noted that 73,000 US soldiers were seriously injured, either mentally or physically, so far. On edit, they went back to the lower number, redefined to exclude those not injured in an actual battle, whatever that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
52. whisper the good news in Molly's ear...we WILL get him!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
53. More details to be released in 24 business hours...
I have no incentive to ever click on a link to that website again.

It will be picked up by legitimate sources if anything ever comes to fruition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
57. Pelosi for President in 2007
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
88. Hey Jack...
I made a bet with a conservative buddy of mine last summer, that the Dems would take back both the House and the Senate. He thought I was batshit crazy, took the bet and lost.

A week ago I saw him and offered a new bet to make his money back. I was willing to bet him that by this time next year it would be President Pelosi.

He shook his head, and refused the bet, LOL!!!

Guess we got 'em shaken up a bit, eh?

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #88
91. It sounds like your friend is a fast learner
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 12:13 PM by Jack Rabbit
I'd put my money (such as it is) on Bush and Cheney being ousted by Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #88
107. I would not bet against this, and neither would Pelosi.
She is already prepping herself by tours abroad, both to familiarize herself and have leaders get to know her - who she is and how she is - in case she is thrust into office. Pelosi is laying a foundation.

If she is in office by the next election, Clinton will lose to her. Clinton is smart and capable, but Pelosi knows better how to connect better with voters and comes with no baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
59. gee...cheney wouldn't do anything that might result in him becoming... gulp ...president...?
would he...?

if it brings down one- hopefully it can bring down BOTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
61. Leopold has gotten our hopes up before
Take this with a grain of salt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. I wouldn't worry - DU came up with this info before it popped up on Truthout.
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 04:00 PM by helderheid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Right.
The TO report is fine. More, the documents listed are actual Court Exhibits. We've linked to them on the Plame Threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
68. Hmm that explains the drums on Iran
cornered rats and all that

Ah watergate in the morning... quite a smell... err stench
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
70. I have always known if Cheney goes down so will Bush
they are joined at the hip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
74. I TOLD YOU SO............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
75. the note proves Cheney is a Freeper
he spells ridiculous "rediculous."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
76. In light of this - Look for Iran Rhetoric to reach Shock and Awe Levels..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
78. Only a Real Decider could make this kinda Decidificaton
Right bunnypants?

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
79. If legit, then it's time to arrest him for treason.
No more political expediancy. No more fucking around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
83. The plot thickens. Pop the popcorn!!







:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
86. Woodamnwhoo!
heh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mick Knox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
87. MSM Can't Ignore this!!! This is the begining of the end!
Whooo hoo

Hard Evidence!

Thank you truthout!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
92. Okay, I'll Be The One To Rain On the Parade!! Does Anyone REALLY
think ANYTHING will actually come of this???

Never has yet, they have squirmed out of every single thing so far, and there has been a GREAT DEAL to Squirm out of!!!

I really don't mean to put the CABASH on things, but I won't believe anything until it ACTUALLY happens. I've gotten my hopes up far too many times, so I won't start blowing up any balloons now just so I have to pop them later!

They'll probably just say this is some sort of MIS-DEE-MEAN-OR!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dethl Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
95. It never rains.....but pours.....keep it coming Fitz!!!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
96. Even if chances of Bushco going down are tiny this is FABULOUS......
Fitzgerald seems to be building an awful lot of momentum in this case and MSM coverage just continues to increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
97. Treasonous Act #417 -- yet he is still sitting in the WH issuing
"executive orders" and "signing statements"

so, whatever ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
102. I'd like to seem them try to squirm out of this one.
Bush: Based on Cheney's note, Bush asked Libby to take the fall for the administration's ham-fisted and security-sacrificing attempts to retaliate against Wilson. (The fact that they were trying to tarnish Wilson for telling the *truth* is icing on the cake.) So Bush asked Libby to obstruct justice to protect Rove.

Cheney: Asked WH press secretary to obstruct justice to protect Libby as well as Rove. (Not wanting Libby *or* Rove--or himself or Bush--to take the fall.

Obstruction of justice = High crimes and misdemeanors.

Done deal. End of story. Take it to the bank.

Other impeachment counts will follow like an avalanche. They will be buried.


Pelosi for President in 2007!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
106. "George didn't lie. Signed, Horshack's mother" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC