Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I agree with Jon's message of unity, but I disagreed with

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rainlillie Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:51 AM
Original message
I agree with Jon's message of unity, but I disagreed with
Him equating Keith and Ed with the Faux news talking heads. Both Keith and Ed were responding to the outright lies that were put out there by the right-wing parrots. Those people are bullies and should be treated as such. My son went to the rally and said when Keith and Ed's clips were included in the montage, people booed and it was a "WTH" moment. I would like to ask Jon how would he like us to respond to the bullies on the right? It seems the folks on the left are the ones who are always told to compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. sometimes I wonder if it's more about ratings and ego for all of the talking
heads including Stewart and Colbert. I'm sure the rally will increase their ratings.

Ok so I'm a little jaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's how we're lurching to the right.
Right back to the 16th century.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's A Condemnation Of The Machine, Not The Parts
I'm one who is very aware of the false equivelency game much of the "punditry" loves to play, but I didn't see that in Jon's message. He was painting a picture of an industry that has risen over the past 15 years that claims to be news but is loaded with opinion. While all will agree the indictment of faux being totally fact free is almost a given...and their demeogagory was a majority of the clips shown, however there is also a degree of verbal verbosity at CNN and MSNBC...and noted as it should be. The clip of KO going over-the-top on Scott Brown was, even by his own admission, over the top and out of line. It doesn't distract from the job Olberman has done over the years but at times he's let ego and emotion get ahead of facts and that's what was being shown. The same goes for Big Ed. I enjoy when he gets on his soapbox but there are times when he'll do his own "psycho talk".

Part of this comes with the territory. In the competitive world these networks exist, the squeaky wheel gets the grease...meaning the ratings and the money. It's an industry that thrives on controversy and its ability to manipulate stories...many times to divide. This was a big part of Jon's message...and yes, there are times I will even point a finger at Jon for doing his own over-the-top shtick...but that's not the point. The fact that Keith let his ego show on his twitter kinda proves Jon's point...and we'll see if KO follows up on it tonight.

BTW...note that there wasn't a clip of Rachel. Methinks its cause she is the rare breed that tries to put the emotion on hold and let the story do the talking. No "Special Comments" or any real editorializing...she lets the viewer do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Rachel certainly DOES editorialize on occasion - she's taken
the administration to task big-time over the whole DADT repeal thing more than once recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. A Matter Of Style
Yes, Rachel has been outspoken on DADT as well as hidden corporate money, but it was not in the context of a "Special Comment" which by Olberman's own admission is a separate segment from the news part of his show. Her opinions are built into the content...something rare and what makes her show stand out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. exactly. and right on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I also didn't agree..
with him bringing on the woman from wall street to give her a medal..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't equate them with what they say, but how the supporters of each fall all over their words
as though they were the most brilliant and wise lines ever uttered. Both sides preach to their perspective choirs who ecstatically shout "Amen!" while the opposing side thinks they are morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Um, you do realize they have the same core constituent, right?
If not, have I ever got a Correspondence dinner video to show you from a few years ago.

They threw a few in from our side as red meat so the pundits couldn't for sure tell where they were coming from. It was an indictment of the 24hour/msm bubble headed talking bloviators. And it was a reminder to us to ignore them as much as possible because they are turning us fearful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. Stewart was an ass Saturday. There are plenty of people to attack over Keith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. did anyone see tweety get all defensive with arianna
yesterday because he thought the criticism of the media was pointed at him? (it was) it's always about tweety with him, isn't it? :nopity:

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Right on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC