Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why it looks as if republicans are way out ahead...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:58 PM
Original message
Why it looks as if republicans are way out ahead...
Most people with Land Lines are 50+ and lean more toward the GOP.

Most people that have cell phones and no Land Lines are under 50 and are more independent leaning toward democrats.

Now there are about 25% of those people who have only cells. These people are not likely to be polled in any of the models that are being touted this past week. Given the assumed demographics, I would say that 90% of gop voters have only landlines and about 75% of those under 50 have land lines.

Of course I could very well be wrong, because I don't know the makeup of the up for grab house seats, but I think there are going to be some disappointed republicans come tuesday night.

Just think about it. I bet most of the people who were at or watched Saturdays festivities probably leans progressive.

Come 2012, you can bet that there will be a way for people to call Cell Phones because of the bad polling data from tomorrows election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're probably right...
I hope so, anyway!

Of course, there are exceptions...We have two land lines, rarely use our cell phones, and are very liberal...

But we're probably the exception that proves the rule...

Recommended.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdsilv Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I have a land line that I only use for outgoing calls (conference calls, business calls working from
home). Incoming calls to my cell are the only ones that get answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There are a lot of households like that...
When we had a land line, we would get called about three or four times a decade for political polls. Since we got rid of the land line in 2006, not one call...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honest - I'm not trying to deflate your argument...
but are there some studies that support this hypothesis? I'm not singling you out, I just want to see some actual stats on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Here is the study that show 25% of people don't have landlines..
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_slow_death_of_the_landline_quarter_of_us_households_wireless_only.php

Now as far as the the other stuff goes, older folks tend to hold onto their landlines because they have trouble hearing Cell Phones and the first alert signal and 911 calls are much better suited to land lines.

I did polling in 2002 and 2004. I saw that more and more registered voters under 50 were not being contacted because of the land line being shut down in lue of Cell phones.

Granted, that was 6 years ago and it wasn't that large a problem, but six years in the technology is a life time.

The study in interesting to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, that isn't entirely true...but just to set the record straight
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 02:22 PM by HereSince1628
According to the Pew Internet & American Life study, "a greater portion of enthusiastic tech users find it more difficult to do without their computer, cell phone and internet than their television and land line telephone". Thirty one percent of the population are considered heavy technology users.

Wired baby boomers: comprise 6% of the TOTAL population and their average age is 52. This group spends ___more money online than any other group!!!!!!____. They all have internet access and -----82%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! have cell phones. They actively gather information online and use the internet for transactions.

Low-Tech Older Baby Boomers: make up 21% of the TOTAL population and their average age is 54. Internet use is ----51%!!!!!!!!(OMG a majority!!!)---- while more of them (60%!!!!!!!! OH CHRIST!!! another majority!!!!) have cell phones.

My point is that a majority of baby boomers (who are now between 64 and 47 years old have CELL PHONES.

The ELDERLY (for whippersnappers this is folks over 32, but really a fair characterization is folks who are 66+ and aren't active) don't use cellphones as much, about 8% have cell phones. Since this group spends most of their time at a residence, and aren't connected to their friends at the ear and because they are adamantly independent, and can make grocery decisions without cellular assistance, they don't rely on mobile phone services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought it important enough to say but NOT 3x worth!!!!!
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 02:21 PM by HereSince1628
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Triple dribble...maybe I AM elderly!
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 02:21 PM by HereSince1628
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. I made a few thousand calls and 75% of those who answered were
55 and over. Of the remaining percentage, often it was kids answering their parents' land line. I've found that parents of kids below 12 still have land lines. And when they find themselves on the phone (after their kids answer it) with somebody who wants to talk politics, they frequently just say "no thank you" and hang up.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. wow, a few thousand? THANK YOU
You are awesome! Interesting inside info, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Agreed, although I think more people than the young have only cell phones.
Times are hard, when you have to cut your budget most people choose to cut the land line, simply because of the convenience of cell phones. IMO.
I bet they do study this election's polling and find out their underrepresented cellphones (and their miscalculated "likely voters") played a big part in their failed results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. I often wonder if many Dems are more likely to not be at home when working multiple jobs...
If more Dems are working multiple jobs and less likely to be at home when a pollster calls, doesn't that favor seniors or others who respond to these polls? Last week I happened to be at my friend's house during the day while they were out at work and I answered a poll call in good progressive fashion, but it got me to thinking that if I weren't there one less progressive voice would have been counted then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. and there are many people, like me, who are not answering the phone!
i hate talking on the phone, even to family and friends. In the past couple of week, I've not answered the phone, just let it go to the machine. Most of the time, no message is left (except that President Obama left me a voicemail yesterday -- nice of him to call. ;)

A few months ago, I did agree to take a poll and was horrified by the leading questions and negative hypothetical questions about some of the candidates. It was a very bizarre experience. That's the last time I'm participating in a poll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep, screening calls....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrs_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I never answer unless I know who it is
i'm a cell phone user, under 50, no landline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I hate talking on the phone.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 07:07 PM by Codeine
Thank goodness for texting, or I'd never communicate with anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southmost Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. in my 20 years of voting,
I've never participated in a poll, neither siblings' households have been polled. We all have land lines, but use the cell phone primarily. I imagine most younger adults are in the same situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. When I had a landline that was listed I got polled every cycle and maybe once for governor
Since I went cell phone only in late 04, not a peep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. My fun time today was
we have two women running for our governorship, one a very good fine Democrat, Jeri Askins and the other, Mary Fallin a pur-d-o-puke republicon. Well the puke one called me this morning asking for my vote and I think it was her on the other end as she introduced herself and it didn't sound like a recorded message so I just hung up. I know it got her panties all wadded up bigger'rn dallas. I loved it. My first thought was to just gently lay the phone down and let her go on and waste time but my better sense told me that I'd have a bigger impact if I'd just hang the damn phone up on her so I did. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. The polling companies aren't stupid. I am sure they take that into account.
If a polling company gets a reputation for inaccuracy, nobody will hire them to take polls. So their experts are able to factor in the difference between cell phones and land lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's weird how the polling vs. results work out for 04, 06, and 08
2004
Dems -3 on polling report vs. Repubs. Seats won by Dems 204.

2006
Dems +13 on polling report vs. Repubs. Seats won by Dems 233.

2008
Dems +12 on polling report vs. Repubs. Seats won by Dems 257

2010
Dems -6 on polling report vs. Repubs. Seats won by Dems ?

The question I have is why didn't we lose seats in 2008? The point advantage went down in 2008, but we got more seats.

http://www.pollingreport.com/cong2004.htm
http://www.pollingreport.com/2006a.htm
http://www.pollingreport.com/cong2008.htm
http://www.pollingreport.com/2010.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_elections,_2004
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_elections,_2006
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_elections,_2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. We can speculate Wednesday: gotv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. They already weight by age. If their response is too old, they bump up the weight for the young.
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 12:14 AM by BzaDem
Same for other demographics.

There still could be a bias in one direction or the other, but that is not NECESSARILY the case just because they don't poll cell phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC