Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cruise ship barely squeezes under bridge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:49 PM
Original message
Cruise ship barely squeezes under bridge
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 10:54 PM by Generic Other
(CNN) -- It was a tight squeeze for a giant new cruise ship sailing from Europe to its home port in in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, over the weekend.

Royal Caribbean's Allure of the Seas passed under Denmark's Storebaelt Bridge with about a foot to spare, drawing applause from people on board the ship.

The captain called it "the great excitement of the day."

The normal height of the ship from the water level to the top is about 73 meters (240 feet), said Capt. Hernan Zini, but the vessel couldn't be higher than 65 meters (213 feet) in order to safely go under the bridge, the captain said.

To make that happen, the crew lowered the ship's retractable twin smokestacks, carefully adjusted the ballast so the ship wouldn't be too light (and therefore sitting too high in the water) and boosted its speed.




http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/11/01/cruise.ship.bridge/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn

Youtube Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1Cs0C8LkeU

cRAZY LOON for a Captain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Limbo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. LOL...It took me way too long to get this comment!
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 11:07 PM by Generic Other
duh!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link please?
Don't want to violate copyright laws - when posting excerpts from a news story, you need to link to the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. oops! Forgot the link
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. That ship is too damn big
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. No, the bridge is too damn small
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I woulda just gunned it with the smoke-stacks upright.
That bridge looks like it has a lot of flexibility in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would have been in the bar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The Poseidon Adventure
I would be swimming out behind you!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. That ship doesn't look seaworthy to me. It looks like a highrise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. It has a twin sister ship already at port in the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Are they going past any icebergs on the way across the Atlantic?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Climate change
they already melted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Too big to fail...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. What is going to happen when the oceans rise
and these ships don't fit under the bridges anymore...makes me wonder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. That'll be the least of our problems at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fat ass ship barely squeezes past size XXXL bridge.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 11:23 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. "She'll hold together!
Hear that, baby? Hold together!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. I remember them moving some giant cranes or something like that...
... under the San Francisco Bay Bridge once. It was also a come in at low tide, squeeze every inch out, clear it by a foot kind of things. Engineering at its most fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. retractable twin smokestacks
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. Looks like it cleared the bridge by about 50 feet
There was actually quite a bit of space there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. 50 feet would be approximately 5 levels of rooms on the ship -
so I doubt it was anywhere close to that much space.

Regardless, the damn thing is way too frickin' big.

What kind of mileage does it get, I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Remember to allow for perspective, in the photo
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 04:49 AM by muriel_volestrangler
The highest point of the roadway is actually at the point where the supporting cable is at its lowest, and that's where the ship has steered - and there's not 50 feet above the highest point of the ship there (as Nostradammit says, that's 5 floors). It may look as though there's more headroom just ahead of that, but that is the photo at the tightest moment - a line that is level in real life would be angled up to the right because of perspective.

You get a head-on shot here, about 2 minutes into the video: http://www.etravelblackboard.com/article/110731/allure-of-the-seas-squeezes-under-store-belt-bridge

It was tight.

On edit: even better - the 'official' video from the ship is here, with a camera right next to the highest point as it goes under (again, about 2 minutes into the video): http://www.luxist.com/2010/11/01/worlds-biggest-cruise-ship-heads-for-home-port/

Yeah, it looks less than a metre clearance.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC