Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

5 Reasons Democrats Could Beat the Polls and Hold the House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TeaBagsAreForCups Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:38 PM
Original message
5 Reasons Democrats Could Beat the Polls and Hold the House
As is customary from Nate, It is a rather long, reasoned, and highly detailed piece which I suggest be read in its entirety; it will make for a more restful night this evening if you do...

5 Reasons Democrats Could Beat the Polls and Hold the House
By NATE SILVER

"While our forecast and a good deal of polling data suggest that the Republicans may win the House of Representatives on Tuesday, perhaps all is not lost for the Democrats. Here’s one possible scenario for how things might not end up as expected.

It was hard to pinpoint exactly when in the night things started to go wrong. But at some point, a trash can was knocked over in John A. Boehner’s office in the Longworth House Office Building. A half-hour later, a hole was punched in the wall at the Republican National Committee’s headquarters.

- SNIP -

A scenario like this one is possible tomorrow — not particularly likely, but possible — just as a 77-seat Republican gain is possible. It’s probably a somewhat greater possibility than people realize. Here are five reasons Democrats could outperform the polls and beat consensus expectations.

1. The cellphone effect.
- SNIP -
2. The “robopoll” effect.
- SNIP -
3. Some likely voter models, particularly Gallup’s, may “crowd out” Democratic voters.
- SNIP -
4. Democrats probably have better turnout operations.
- SNIP -
5. The consensus view of Democratic doom is not on such sound footing as it seems.

- SNIP -

Nor, probably, will it turn out to be the correct one; more likely than not, Republicans will indeed win the House, and will do so by a significant margin. But just as Republicans could beat the consensus, Democrats could too, and nobody should be particularly shocked if they do."

___________________________________________
As I suggested, there is literally tons of narrative buried at each of the snipped points. Indeed, his thesis for point 3 relative to Gallup goes on for a page and a half alone - so a full reading is best:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/5-reasons-democrats-could-beat-the-polls-and-hold-the-house/?hp


And, yes. Nate Silver. Five Thirty Eight...It will be interesting to see how this article is embraced. Especially considering other threads relative to Nate's exemplary and professional work where he enjoyed little other than derisive criticism and dismissal when he was saying things some did not wish to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Saw this on the NYTimes
interesting analysis, and thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeaBagsAreForCups Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. NP, I always find Nate's work...
... respectable, competent, and never influenced nor biased with partisan motivations. He's quite good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Democrats could too, and nobody should be particularly shocked if they do."
I guess that lets the punditry off the hook. They don't have to be shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obliviously Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. so what you're saying is we don't know the future
who would have thought, fascinating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ah now nate goes into the cell phone effect
It is going to be much larger. Been saying this for over two weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'll add number 6:
Republicans are starting to whine about voting irregularities. What we call "election fraud" (compromised machines) they insist on calling "voter fraud" to make us feel guilty for voting and to blame the victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think anyone could disagree that this is an outcome that is theoretically possible.
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 12:08 AM by BzaDem
Nate's saying that this is about as likely as Republicans gaining almost 80 House seats. I think that's about accurate. Unlikely, but anything's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Main Stream Media has manufactured the 'Enthusiasm Gap' from whole cloth
There is no 'Enthusiasm Gap', and it is a badly promoted MSM ploy to influence the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick and recommend!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Personally,
I'd rather not get my hopes up just to have them dashed.

I'd rather be pleasantly surprised than overly optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh Nate. CYA on election morn. After howling for months about the Rethug tsunami. Okay fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC