http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/most-job-loss-offshoring-not-recessionSubmitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 03/06/2010 - 13:42 Fritz HollingsInsourcing/Outsourcingpolicy
Most of the job loss is from off-shoring, not the recession.
I point to an editorial on the Huffington Post by Sen. Fritz Hollings. He's calling out D.C. and saying Washington is plain committing fraud on job creation by refusing to address trade and global labor arbitrage.
An important part of the job fraud is to make the people feel like the loss of jobs is due to the recession, not off-shoring. Long before the recession, South Carolina lost its textile industry; North Carolina lost its furniture industry; Detroit its automobile industry, and California its computer industry, etc. President Obama wants to increase exports, but we have nothing to export. Today, the United States has the export profile of an eighteenth century colony, with the only value-added products exported being chemicals, agriculture and airplanes. Last week, the Wall Street Journal announced that the largest chemical producer in the United States was off-shoring. Most of the job loss is from off-shoring, not the recession. But Washington acts as if nothing can be done to limit the off-shoring and protect our economy.
Globalization has developed into a trade war with production looking for the cheapest country to produce, with fierce competition for industry and jobs. Necessarily, every country has developed an industrial policy in this competition to protect its economy.
One can see the truth that job loss is not just this recession, but a long steady decline caused by global labor arbitrage. Just look at the total number of jobs in a particular occupational category over a decade. For one example, see this graph on information services jobs.